2011
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/12/008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine features in the primordial power spectrum

Abstract: Abstract. A possible origin of the anomalous dip and bump in the primordial power spectrum, which are reconstructed from WMAP data corresponding to the multipole ℓ = 100 ∼ 140 by using the inversion method, is investigated as a consequence of modification of scalar field dynamics in the inflation era. Utilizing an analytic formula to handle higher order corrections to the slow-roll approximation, we evaluate the relation between a detailed shape of inflaton potential and a fine structure in the primordial powe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More complex models generating deviations from scale invariance include those with features on the potential (Starobinsky 1992;Adams et al 2001;Wang et al 2005;Hunt & Sarkar 2004Joy et al 2008;Pahud et al 2009;Lerner & McDonald 2009;Kumazaki et al 2011;Meerburg et al 2012;Ashoorioon & Krause 2006;Ashoorioon et al 2009), a small number of e-folds (Contaldi et al 2003;Powell & Kinney 2007;Nicholson & Contaldi 2008), or other exotic inflationary models (Lesgourgues 2000;Feng & Zhang 2003;Mathews et al 2004;Jain et al 2009;Romano & Sasaki 2008;Piao et al 2004;Choudhury et al 2013;Choudhury & Mazumdar 2014). Therefore, determining the shape of the primordial power spectrum will allow us to evaluate how well these models of the early Universe compare to the observations, rule out some of the proposed models, and thus will give us a better intuition into the conditions of the primordial Universe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More complex models generating deviations from scale invariance include those with features on the potential (Starobinsky 1992;Adams et al 2001;Wang et al 2005;Hunt & Sarkar 2004Joy et al 2008;Pahud et al 2009;Lerner & McDonald 2009;Kumazaki et al 2011;Meerburg et al 2012;Ashoorioon & Krause 2006;Ashoorioon et al 2009), a small number of e-folds (Contaldi et al 2003;Powell & Kinney 2007;Nicholson & Contaldi 2008), or other exotic inflationary models (Lesgourgues 2000;Feng & Zhang 2003;Mathews et al 2004;Jain et al 2009;Romano & Sasaki 2008;Piao et al 2004;Choudhury et al 2013;Choudhury & Mazumdar 2014). Therefore, determining the shape of the primordial power spectrum will allow us to evaluate how well these models of the early Universe compare to the observations, rule out some of the proposed models, and thus will give us a better intuition into the conditions of the primordial Universe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See[156][157][158][159][160][161][162][163][164][165][166][167][168][169][170][171][172][173] for various extensions and applications of this method and[174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181][182][183][184][185][186] for other related methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature spectrum [44], temperature non-Gaussianity [45][46][47], and polarization [48] can all be scanned for this purpose. Usually, fine features are inserted ad hoc in the power spectrum [43,49] or generated by inflationary dynamics [43,[50][51][52], while in the present case they arise purely from geometry. Since features can even improve the fit of Planck 2015 data [52], the issue at stake here is not just how to constrain the parameters of one or more quantum-gravity models, but also whether these models can account for some details of the CMB multipole spectrum better than the standard ΛCDM model of general relativity.…”
Section: Can We Observe Complex Dimensions?mentioning
confidence: 96%