2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12011-009-8359-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Findings on the Phytoextraction and Phytostabilization of Soils Contaminated with Heavy Metals

Abstract: As a result of human activities such as mining, metal pollution has become one of the most serious environmental problems today. Phytoremediation, an emerging cost-effective, non-intrusive, and aesthetically pleasing technology that uses the remarkable ability of plants to concentrate elements can be potentially used to remediate metal-contaminated sites. The aim of this work was to assess the extent of metal accumulation by plants found in a mining area in Hamedan province with the ultimate goal of finding su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of cadmium accumulation in roots and shoots of other grasses, such as Lolium perenne (Lou et al, 2013), Elymus elongatus (Sipos et al, 2013) and Secale cereale , also shows that roots tend to contain more of this metal than shoots. Mendez and Maier (2008), Cheraghi et al (2011) and Zhang et al (2012) have recommended plants (monocotyledons and dicotyledons) with a high BAF (> 1) and a low translocation index (TRL < 1) as the best candidates for phytostabilization. The values of TRL for F. ovina growing at 1 μg ml -1 as well as at 10 μg ml -1 were much lower than 1 (0.04 and 0.14, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of cadmium accumulation in roots and shoots of other grasses, such as Lolium perenne (Lou et al, 2013), Elymus elongatus (Sipos et al, 2013) and Secale cereale , also shows that roots tend to contain more of this metal than shoots. Mendez and Maier (2008), Cheraghi et al (2011) and Zhang et al (2012) have recommended plants (monocotyledons and dicotyledons) with a high BAF (> 1) and a low translocation index (TRL < 1) as the best candidates for phytostabilization. The values of TRL for F. ovina growing at 1 μg ml -1 as well as at 10 μg ml -1 were much lower than 1 (0.04 and 0.14, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different letters represent significant difference (P < 0.05) among treatment of the humic substances. *Significant difference (P < 0.05) between ecotypes stable and efficient way than precipitation within the rhizosphere, which could result in a release of heavy metals to soils with a change of environmental conditions (Meeinkuirt et al 2013;Cheraghi et al 2011). Thus, looking for much more effective measures to enhance phytoremediation potential of plant is a key point in phytostabilization technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy involves the use of Communicated by Zhihong Xu metal-tolerant plant species to immobilize metals through absorption and accumulation by roots, or precipitation within the rhizosphere, thus reducing metal mobility and bioavailability in the environment (Conesa et al 2006;Cheraghi et al 2011). However, the bioavailability of heavy metals in soils is a limiting factor to the phytostabilization capacity of plants (Lambrechts et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, all BF aboveground parts were much lower than 1.0, indicating a total lack of usefulness of the tested plants for phytoextraction (McGrath and Zhao 2003). At the same time, the value of BF roots close to 1.0 for Z. mays suggests its suitability for phytostabilization (Cheraghi et al 2011).…”
Section: Ni Accumulation and Translocationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Plants with a high biomass and high bioaccumulation factor for aboveground parts (BF aboveground parts > 1) are appropriate for phytoextraction (Cheraghi et al 2011;McGrath and Zhao 2003), while plants with a high bioaccumulation factor for roots (BF roots > 1) and, simultaneously, with a low translocation factor (TF < 1) are appropriate for phytostabilization (Cheraghi et al 2011;Roccotiello et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%