2004
DOI: 10.1097/01202412-200405000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Findings of fibular hemimelia syndrome with radiographically normal fibulae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Searle CP et al [9] proposed type 0 fibular hemimelia which had features of fibular hemimelia syndrome except Fig. 2 Fibular hemiemlia patient shows knee valgus deformity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Searle CP et al [9] proposed type 0 fibular hemimelia which had features of fibular hemimelia syndrome except Fig. 2 Fibular hemiemlia patient shows knee valgus deformity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system divides fibular hemimelia into type IA, IB, II according to the severity of fibular hypoplasia and all require some element of fibular hypoplasia. Recently, Searle CP et al [9] proposed type 0 fibular hemimelia which has features of fibular hemimelia syndrome except for radiographically normal fibulae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristically “anomalous limb” (Arnold, ) featuring fibular deficiency has become popularized as a designated entity, fibular hemimelia , despite variable structural alterations involving the entire lower limb (Freund, ; Kruger & Talbott, ; O'Rahilly, ). The fibular deficiency may even be described as radiographically normal (Searle, Hildebrand, Lester, & Caskey, ). It also may be overshadowed by other accompanying dysmorphic limb features, including clubfoot (Caskey & Lester, ), or by more severe ipsilateral femoral deficiencies (Bedoya et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feet manifesting fewer than the normal complement of five metatarsals (44-84%) (Rodriguez-Ramirez, Thacker, Becerra, Riddle, & MacKenzie, 2010; Thompson, Straub, & Arnold, 1957) have been clinically and radiographically identifiable in congenitally shortened limbs (CSL) exhibiting fibular deficiencies (Achterman & Kalamchi, 1979;Reyes et al, 2017). Isolated metatarsal reductions have also been identified in the feet of limbs with features of apparent congenital shortening despite radiographically normal fibulae (Baek, Kim, Chung, & Lee, 2008;Searle, Hildebrand, Lester, & Caskey, 2004). An inverse relationship between leg length discrepancy and the absence of metatarsal rays has been observed: the more normal the foot, the greater the (femoral) shortening (Kruger et al, 1961;Rodriguez-Ramirez et al, 2010).…”
Section: Midline Metatarsal Deficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%