2018
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Findings from the 2018 Yearbook Section on Human Factors and Organizational Issues

Abstract: The selection of the HFOI section of the 2018 IMIA Yearbook highlights a growing number of high quality studies. There are especially more studies interested in testing Human Factors and Ergonomics methods and demonstrating the benefits.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A structural and functional redesign of systems would emphasize evaluation, effectiveness, implementation, and application of process improvement [ 59 , 60 , 85 , 89 ]. It includes approaches to causal questions using cross-sectional and longitudinal dimensions, multilevel foci, and objective measures for clinical (engagement, meaningfulness of tasks, process and quality measures, and clinical and safety outcomes), human factors (workload, rewards, fitness, needs, and well-being), training, professional development, and administrative (value alignment, productivity, IS, strategic planning, resources, and participative management) workflows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A structural and functional redesign of systems would emphasize evaluation, effectiveness, implementation, and application of process improvement [ 59 , 60 , 85 , 89 ]. It includes approaches to causal questions using cross-sectional and longitudinal dimensions, multilevel foci, and objective measures for clinical (engagement, meaningfulness of tasks, process and quality measures, and clinical and safety outcomes), human factors (workload, rewards, fitness, needs, and well-being), training, professional development, and administrative (value alignment, productivity, IS, strategic planning, resources, and participative management) workflows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection here highlights a growing number of high-quality studies, based on solid well-described methodologies. This year, we saw the same trend as last year for the Human Factors and Organizational Issues section with an increase of the number of papers meeting the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Yearbook scientific quality requirements 2 . However, we continue to see poorly designed health IT and negative impact on patients 3 and clinicians 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…These have suggested for CSW professional development, research, and training, as well as applicability toward licensure, certification, and policy (Merrill et al, 2021 ). Some organizations employ human factors engineering and usability assessments (Szalma et al, 2014 ; Pelayo et al, 2018 ). Clinicians will find work easier with teamwork and if the structure and process are aligned across settings and contexts (e.g., work, home, mobile/virtual) (Yeh et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The business culture has expanded the tetrad—research, production, and marketing, and finance – to a pentad by integrating technology rather than appending it (Ray et al, 2007 ), and employing an IT architecture (Ross et al, 2003 ). Structural and functional redesign of workflow should include evaluation, process improvement, implementation and other human factor adjustments for clinical, training/professional development, and administrative practices (Hilty et al, 2022 ; Pelayo et al, 2018 ; Proctor et al, 2010 ; Szalma et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%