Sovereign Debt and the Financial Crisis 2010
DOI: 10.1596/9780821384831_ch03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding the Tipping Point: When Sovereign Debt Turns Bad

Abstract: The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the International Ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
5
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also graphically shown in Figure 2 (B and B′). This result supports the argument that countries with better institutions, that is, PSM, have (and deserve) higher public debt sustainability targets compared with those with weaker institutions (Reinhart et al, 2003;Caner et al, 2010;Cordella et al, 2010).…”
Section: Results From Non-linearity ("Inverse-u") Testsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This is also graphically shown in Figure 2 (B and B′). This result supports the argument that countries with better institutions, that is, PSM, have (and deserve) higher public debt sustainability targets compared with those with weaker institutions (Reinhart et al, 2003;Caner et al, 2010;Cordella et al, 2010).…”
Section: Results From Non-linearity ("Inverse-u") Testsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The thresholding parameter C is always chosen among the lowest values in the search grid, this nonetheless results in between 1 and 3 extra parameters being discarded compared to the scaled Lasso. A threshold ( τ ) for the effect of government debt on growth is found at between 60% and 80% of GDP, consistent with the findings of Cecchetti et al (2012); Reinhart and Rogoff (2010); Caner et al (2010); Baum et al (2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…): Caner et al . () in 79 developed and developing countries for 1980–2008; Checherita and Rother () in 12 Euro economies for 1970–2008; Cecchetti et al . () in 18 OECD countries for 1980–2005; Balassone et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the results tend to vary depending on the regression methods, specifications and samples (countries and periods), many of these studies find a strikingly similar range of impact magnitude: on average, a 10 percentage point increase in the debt‐to‐GDP ratio is associated with a decline in annual growth of around 0.1–0.2 percentage points per year (see, among others, Kumar and Woo ; Caner et al . ; Cecchetti et al . ; Balassone et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%