2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.11.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding the solution of nonlinear equations by a class of optimal methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is suitable to develop a fourth-order method from the third-order method to improve the efficiency. For the scalar case, we can suggest the following quartical iteration, which is in fact a Jarratt-type iterative method including three functional evaluations to reach the highest possible order four [13] y…”
Section: Description Of a New Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is suitable to develop a fourth-order method from the third-order method to improve the efficiency. For the scalar case, we can suggest the following quartical iteration, which is in fact a Jarratt-type iterative method including three functional evaluations to reach the highest possible order four [13] y…”
Section: Description Of a New Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advancement of computer algebra, many researchers like Chun [8], Chun and Ham [9], Cordero et al [10], Sharma and Ghua [11], Kanwar et al [12], Sharifi et al [13], Soleymani et al [14] and Behl et al [15], among others, proposed various optimal schemes or families of methods of order four. But Ostrowski', Jarratt' and King's methods are between the most efficient fourth-order methods known to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is a three-point method requiring 1 function and 3 first derivative evaluations and has an efficiency index of 3 1/4 = 1.316 which is lower than 2 1/2 = 1.414 of the 1-point Newton method. Recently, the order of many variants of Newton's method have been improved using the same number of functional evaluations by means of weight functions (see [2][3][4][5][6][7] and the references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%