2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding strong defining hyperplanes of PPS using multiplier form

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the optimal solution of (4) is unique, then the corresponding supporting hyperplane is a defining hyperplane and if (4) has alternative optimal solutions, then there are uncountable supporting hyperplanes on the PPS at the projection of DMU on the efficient frontier in which a finite number of them are defining hyperplanes. Jahanshahloo et al [23] show that, in evaluating an efficient DMU, each extreme optimal solution of (4) such that ( * , * ) > 0 identifies an efficient defining hyperplane of the PPS.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the optimal solution of (4) is unique, then the corresponding supporting hyperplane is a defining hyperplane and if (4) has alternative optimal solutions, then there are uncountable supporting hyperplanes on the PPS at the projection of DMU on the efficient frontier in which a finite number of them are defining hyperplanes. Jahanshahloo et al [23] show that, in evaluating an efficient DMU, each extreme optimal solution of (4) such that ( * , * ) > 0 identifies an efficient defining hyperplane of the PPS.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method we also cannot determine the variation range of inputs and outputs and stability region of additional DMU. However, in our method, since n earlier DMUs evaluated by multiplier form and the classification of efficient and inefficient DMUs specified, we can easily find all defining hyperplanes of T v with applying the proposed algorithm in Jahanshahloo et al (2009). On the other hand, using optimal solutions of the multiplier form when n DMUs are evaluated, we can determine the stability region of additional DMU which satisfies the special conditions for the rest of DMUs (For example, the efficiency score of a specific inefficient unit must be preserved or some competitor efficient units need to be inefficient in the presence of additional DMU).…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the additional DMU, we first find all efficient DMUs (with model (2)) and defining hyperplanes of T v (for a review see Jahanshahloo et al 2005cJahanshahloo et al , 2007Jahanshahloo et al , 2009) which we are interested in. It has been assumed that the redundant hyperplanes, which have no effect on the PPS, are omitted.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characterisations of the PPS in DEA is found by specifying all defining hyperplanes of the PPS which construct the frontier of the PPS. Jahanshahloo et al (2009) have shown that the hyperplane which corresponds to an extreme optimal solution of the multiplier form whose components corresponding to inputs and outputs are non-zero is an efficient defining hyperplane of the PPS. Fukuyama and Sekitani (2012) decomposed the efficient frontier in to a new class of maximal efficient faces, and they have found a method to identify all maximal efficient faces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%