2015
DOI: 10.17706/jcp.10.5.292-299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding Similar Users in Social Networks by Using the Neural-Based Skyline Region

Abstract: Abstract:Finding similar users in a community network is a very important part of the recommendation system. Traditionally, algorithms of this kind are based on a single condition to search for similar users. In recent years, some scholars have proposed the popular multi-criteria algorithm Skyline Query to search for similar users. However, their proposed methods might have found users not similar to the target user and are subject to the problem of slow execution. To solve these issues, this paper introduces … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most conventional recommendation systems use cosine similarity (Lu et al , 2012; Shamir and Tishby, 2010) or k -means algorithms (Li et al , 2008) to combine the multi-dimensional data of a user into a single score, and then search for similar users based on this score. However, this approach is actually highly illogical – as the dimensions of user data are independent and unrelated, they should not be combined into a single indicator (Hou et al , 2015). For example, Tables I and II are largely similar, with the exception of Table II having an additional User G. Both Users G and A have similar ratings for the Tokyo National Museum but different ratings for the other two Tokyo attractions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most conventional recommendation systems use cosine similarity (Lu et al , 2012; Shamir and Tishby, 2010) or k -means algorithms (Li et al , 2008) to combine the multi-dimensional data of a user into a single score, and then search for similar users based on this score. However, this approach is actually highly illogical – as the dimensions of user data are independent and unrelated, they should not be combined into a single indicator (Hou et al , 2015). For example, Tables I and II are largely similar, with the exception of Table II having an additional User G. Both Users G and A have similar ratings for the Tokyo National Museum but different ratings for the other two Tokyo attractions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second method, developed by Hou et al (2015), uses the skyline region concept to identify users similar to A. The first step is to identify the skyline users of A, and then establish a threshold σ to map out a skyline region, as shown on the dotted line of the Figure 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation