2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10589-007-9070-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding preferred subsets of Pareto optimal solutions

Abstract: Multi-objective optimization algorithms can generate large sets of Pareto optimal (non-dominated) solutions. Identifying the best solutions across a very large number of Pareto optimal solutions can be a challenge. Therefore it is useful for the decision-maker to be able to obtain a small set of preferred Pareto optimal solutions. This paper analyzes a discrete optimization problem introduced to obtain optimal subsets of solutions from large sets of Pareto optimal solutions. This discrete optimization problem … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ferreira et al [48] proposed a methodology, based on a weight stress function approach, to select a single solution (or a set of solutions) from the set of non-dominated solutions, taking into account the preferences of the decision-maker. Kao and Jacobson [49] studied the problem of post-optimality selection by providing a framework to obtain a preferred subset of solutions from a very large set of solutions. A value function represents the preferences of a decisionmaker across the objective functions.…”
Section: Preferences In Multi-objective Evolutionary Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferreira et al [48] proposed a methodology, based on a weight stress function approach, to select a single solution (or a set of solutions) from the set of non-dominated solutions, taking into account the preferences of the decision-maker. Kao and Jacobson [49] studied the problem of post-optimality selection by providing a framework to obtain a preferred subset of solutions from a very large set of solutions. A value function represents the preferences of a decisionmaker across the objective functions.…”
Section: Preferences In Multi-objective Evolutionary Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal process time of machine on each product type should be the same in all planning periods as manager desires so, (7) because of preventive maintenance activities, the available time in each planning period could be different of the others, in other word, the makespan in each planning period should be less than or equal to available time of that period, (8) each product type has its own demand in every planning period that is a finite, deterministic and integer value, (9) there is no initial stock of inventory for each product type, (10) products should be produced in a way that there would be no lost sales until the end of the last planning period, but back order is allowed in every period except the last period. In the other words, the sum of the amounts produced and delivered to customer during all periods should not be less than the sum of demands over all of periods, (11) unit shortage cost and unit inventory holding cost are deterministic values that could be different from a period to another period, (12) setup consists of some activities for each product type such as adjusting the machine speed, changing the tool, brushing and cleaning the machine, etc. And cost of changing the setup is so high.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If scalarization is done carefully, Pareto optimality of the solutions obtained can be guaranteed. There has been a great deal of effort by the researchers in the area (especially in recent years) for developing methods to generate an approximation of the Pareto front (see e.g., [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%