Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Computational Linguistics - 1999
DOI: 10.3115/1034678.1034697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding parts in very large corpora

Abstract: We present a method for extracting parts of objects from wholes (e.g. "speedometer" from "car"). Given a very large corpus our method finds part words with 55% accuracy for the top 50 words as ranked by the system. The part list could be scanned by an end-user and added to an existing ontology (such as WordNet), or used as a part of a rough semantic lexicon.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
192
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
192
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Patterns (symmetric or not) were found useful in a variety of NLP tasks, including identification of word relations such as hyponymy (Hearst, 1992), meronymy (Berland and Charniak, 1999) and antonymy (Lin et al, 2003). Patterns have also been applied to tackle sentence level tasks such as identification of sarcasm , sentiment analysis and authorship attribution (Schwartz et al, 2013).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patterns (symmetric or not) were found useful in a variety of NLP tasks, including identification of word relations such as hyponymy (Hearst, 1992), meronymy (Berland and Charniak, 1999) and antonymy (Lin et al, 2003). Patterns have also been applied to tackle sentence level tasks such as identification of sarcasm , sentiment analysis and authorship attribution (Schwartz et al, 2013).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous work patterns were used to represent a variety of semantic relations, including hyponymy (Hearst, 1992), meronymy (Berland and Charniak, 1999) and antonymy (Lin et al, 2003). Here, in order to capture similarity between words, we use Symmetric patterns (SPs), such as "X and Y" and "X as well as Y", where each of the words in the pair can take either the X or the Y position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, extracting hyponyms [10], synonyms [13], meronyms [5] are specific instances of this general problem of relation extraction. Manually created or automatically extracted lexico-syntactic patterns have been successfully used to identify various relations between words [17,18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Natural language processing. We can utilize known techniques (e.g., [4]) to parse each sentence of a text or its summary obtained by means of text summarization [44]. For each resulting triple subject, predicate, object , we try to match it with the patterns s, p, o in the domain ontologies, where p is a property of the concept s and has a value typed of o.…”
Section: Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%