1996
DOI: 10.1016/0167-9473(96)00007-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding multiple abrupt change points

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this table, we may also calculate any of several measures of the degree to which ones and zeros are distributed randomly in the segments defined by the given segmentation. For example, we may determine values for chi-square (equivalent to the mean-squared error measure used by Venter and Steel (1996), as well as an extension of the Anderson-Darling statistic to multiple changepoints) , Fisher's exact test, likelihood ratios under the null hypothesis and under the alternative hypothesis indicated by the given segmentation, or a generalization of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample statistic. These measures have been employed previously for the problem of detecting a single changepoint in a binary sequence (see Halpern, 1999 for discussion of differences between measures).…”
Section: Testing For Multiple Changepointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From this table, we may also calculate any of several measures of the degree to which ones and zeros are distributed randomly in the segments defined by the given segmentation. For example, we may determine values for chi-square (equivalent to the mean-squared error measure used by Venter and Steel (1996), as well as an extension of the Anderson-Darling statistic to multiple changepoints) , Fisher's exact test, likelihood ratios under the null hypothesis and under the alternative hypothesis indicated by the given segmentation, or a generalization of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample statistic. These measures have been employed previously for the problem of detecting a single changepoint in a binary sequence (see Halpern, 1999 for discussion of differences between measures).…”
Section: Testing For Multiple Changepointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Finally, our third question: Should we reject Ho? As discussed by Venter and Steel (1996), the Bonferroni argument gives (Nl)PN as a conservative estimate of the probability of obtaining at least as small a value of PN as that of our sequence of interest by chance. For the current implementation, concerned with binary sequences with an alternating pattern of segment types, the bound might be acceptable for N less than four or five but becomes excessively conservative as N rises.…”
Section: Testing For Multiple Changepointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a substantial statistical literature on methods for detecting change points. Many early methods relied on classic significance testing to find changes, using standard parametric and non-parametric tests (e.g., Pettitt, 1979;Venter & Steel, 1996). Bayesian approaches were also developed relatively early.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Belisle et al (1998) made inferences about the Bayesian hierarchical change-point model with an ensemble of sample paths for neuron spike train data. In the multiple change-point setting, Venter and Steel (1996) identified multiple abrupt change-points in a sequence of observations via hypothesis testing. Hawkins (2001) developed an approach with maximum likelihood estimates of the change-points and within-segment parameters in the exponential family.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%