2012 Third International Conference on Networking and Computing 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icnc.2012.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding Multi-Objective Shortest Paths Using Memory-Efficient Stochastic Evolution Based Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of existing acceleration techniques for multicriteria shortest path search are heuristics returning nearly optimal solutions. Some approaches are based on heuristic optimization methods, for example stochastic evolutionary algorithms [14,15]. Other ones employ standard label-setting or label-correcting techniques combined with relaxation heuristics providing substantial speedups at the cost of solution optimality.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of existing acceleration techniques for multicriteria shortest path search are heuristics returning nearly optimal solutions. Some approaches are based on heuristic optimization methods, for example stochastic evolutionary algorithms [14,15]. Other ones employ standard label-setting or label-correcting techniques combined with relaxation heuristics providing substantial speedups at the cost of solution optimality.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [21] investigates the evolving ability of a cellular automaton with a type of memory based on the least mean square algorithm. Reference [22] presents a memory-efficient stochastic evolution-based algorithm for solving multiobjective shortest path problems. Reference [23] presents a clonal selection subpixel mapping framework by building a memory cell population.…”
Section: Memory-based Evolutionary Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing their results and convergence, it is easy to observe the performance advantage of HMPSO over its competitors. The last three rows in Table III indicate that the numbers of functions for which HMPSO are better than CPSO-H6, CLPSO, ALCPSO, FIPS, HPSO-TVAC, EDA-PSO, and PSEDA are 21,18,21,25,22,27, and 27, respectively. The numbers of functions for which they are similar to 1.…”
Section: B Comparison With Seven Pso Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%