2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-10745-0_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding Groups in Ordinal Data: An Examination of Some Clustering Procedures

Abstract: The article evaluates, based on ordinal data simulated with cluster.Gen function of clusterSim package working in R environment, some cluster analysis procedures containing GDM distance for ordinal data (see [4,18,19]), nine clustering methods and eight internal cluster quality indices for determining the number of clusters. Seventy two clustering procedures are evaluated based on simulated data originating from a variety of models. Models contain the known structure of clusters and differ in the number of tru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are well-known and have been presented by various authors, for example [36]. The interval and ratio scales are high [37]. In the present study, the authors applied metric data (interval, ratio).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…These results are well-known and have been presented by various authors, for example [36]. The interval and ratio scales are high [37]. In the present study, the authors applied metric data (interval, ratio).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This allows researchers to choose the optimal algorithm and number of clusters with a majority rule based on a battery of internal validity and stability measures (for a full description, see [ 6 ]). We tested average and ward linkage for the hierarchical clustering due to previous simulation study from Walesiak and Dudek [ 54 ] reporting them as the best linkages for ordinal data. The average linkage considers the distance between two clusters as the average distance between each point in one cluster to every point in the other cluster, whereas ward linkage is a method that minimizes the error sum of squares between the clusters over all the variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 10 , 12 ] Trained clinicians assessed the functioning level of each participant and interrater reliability tests were performed regularly to calibrate the Global Functioning scales; GF-Social [Intraclass Correlation (ICC) = 0.945 and GF-Role (ICC = 0.924)] across study sites [ 29 ]. We compared the differences in social and role functioning scores between two clusters with the Mann–Whitney- U test [ 32 ] or with the Welch’s two-sample t -test [ 54 ] after checking for normal distribution with the Shapiro–Wilk test [ 48 ]. 3b) Association of FTD-defined subgroups and neurocognitive performance …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That means for all requests there is the information if no preference [0], preference [1] or strong preference [2] for each according category (residential roads, main roads, no main roads without infrastructure, avoid cobblestones, green pathways) is stated. Dissimilarities (c): The asymmetric Manhattan method as proposed by [35] is used to calculate a distance matrix for the specific case of ordinal data. In order to do so, the relative distance between every pair of observations in the dataset is calculated and organized in the distance matrix.…”
Section: Sample (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%