Finding diamonds in the rough: Analysts’ selective following of loss‐reporting firms

Abstract

Investors face greater difficulty valuing loss-reporting than profitreporting firms: losses may be due to very different reasons (e.g., poor operating performance or investments in intangibles, and financial accounting information is of more limited use for valuing lossmaking firms than profit-making firms. Because of increased uncertainty about loss firms' future financial and business viability, we hypothesize that financial analysts will be more selective when choosing to follow loss firms than profit firms, with the result that "abnormal" analyst following will be more informative to investors regarding the future performance of loss firms than profit firms. Consistent with this prediction, we find that abnormal analyst coverage is useful for predicting firms' future prospects, and is more strongly associated with future performance (stock returns and ROA) for loss firms than for profit firms. The market, however, does not seem to use this useful information when pricing loss firms: for loss firms a portfolio investment strategy based upon abnormal analyst following can generate positive excess returns over 1-to 3-year holding periods. These results are stronger for persistent-loss firms than for occasional-loss firms. We conclude that abnormal analyst following contains useful information about firms' future prospects, and even more so for loss firms than for profit firms. K E Y W O R D Sanalyst following, future performance, loss firms, self-selection 140

Minimum tick size and analyst coverage: Evidence from the Tick Size Pilot Program

“…This result suggests that analysts’ coverage decisions may be related to the minimum tick size and if so, the relationship is negative—as spreads increase due to higher minimum tick size, analysts are more likely to drop coverage on the stock. With respect to firm characteristics that impact analysts’ coverage decisions, Byard, Darrough, Suh, and Tian (2018) find that fewer analysts follow loss‐making firms relative to profit‐making firms and that firm performance, captured by future earnings and stock returns, is significantly associated with higher levels of analyst following.…”

Comparabilidade dos relatórios financeiros e informatividade dos preços das ações no Brasil

“…Já a variável COMPM⁎TAM, é negativa, porém ainda significativa ao nível de confiança de 5%, corroborando os achados de Sarlo Neto, Bassi e Almeida (2011). Byard et al (2018), os investidores enfrentam maior dificuldade em avaliar os relatórios de empresas que apresentam prejuízos do que de empresas que apresentam lucro, pois os prejuízos podem ocorrer por razões muito diferentes, como mal desempenho operacional ou investimentos em ativos intangíveis. Nesse sentido, as informações contábeis financeiras são de uso mais limitado para avaliar as empresas que apresentam prejuízos do as empresas que evidenciam lucros (BYARD et al, 2018).…”

The pricing of firms with expected losses/profits: The role of January

“…In a concurrent study, Byard, Suh, Darrough, and Tian () examine why some loss firms receive greater analyst coverage than other loss firms and find that analyst following is greater for loss firms that have better future prospects. While Byard et al.…”