2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23525-7_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding Dense Subgraphs in Relational Graphs

Abstract: This paper considers the problem of finding large dense subgraphs in relational graphs, i.e., a set of graphs which share a common vertex set. We present an approximation algorithm for finding the densest common subgraph in a relational graph set based on an extension of Charikar's method for finding the densest subgraph in a single graph. We also present a simple greedy heuristic which can be implemented efficiently for analysis of larger graphs. We give graph dependent bounds on the quality of the solutions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We apply multilayer core decomposition to provide provable approximation guarantees for this problem. We also show that our formulation generalizes the minimum-average densestcommon-subgraph problem studied in [25,49,65,70], and our method achieves approximation guarantees for that problem too. Furthermore, in Section 6, we show how to exploit multilayer core decomposition to speed-up the problem of finding frequent cross-graph quasi-cliques [50].Community search.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We apply multilayer core decomposition to provide provable approximation guarantees for this problem. We also show that our formulation generalizes the minimum-average densestcommon-subgraph problem studied in [25,49,65,70], and our method achieves approximation guarantees for that problem too. Furthermore, in Section 6, we show how to exploit multilayer core decomposition to speed-up the problem of finding frequent cross-graph quasi-cliques [50].Community search.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, this would mean disregarding the different semantics of the layers, incurring in a severe information loss. Within this view, in this work we generalize the problem studied in [25,49,65,70] by introducing a formulation that accounts for a trade-off between high density and number of layers exhibiting the high density. Specifically, given a multilayer graph G = (V , E, L), the average-degree density of a subset of vertices S in a layer ℓ is defined as the number of edges induced by S in ℓ divided by the size of S, i.e., |E ℓ [S ]| |S | .…”
Section: Challenges Contributions and Roadmapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At first, we prove that the problem is NP-hard. Then, we show that computing the multilayer core decomposition of the input graph and selecting the core maximizing the proposed multilayer density function achieves a 1 2|L | β -approximation for the general multilayer-densest-subgraph problem formulation, and a 1 2 -approximation for the all-layer specific variant studied in [9,19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subgraphs, discovered in the network of Twitter hashtags Twitter# by KGAPPROX algorithm with k = 4, DS = DP = 0.1.interval partitioning and consider only graphs that are span continuous intervals. Other close works are by Jethava and Beerenwinkel[50] and Semertzidis et al[16]. However, these works consider a set of snapshots and search for a single heavy subgraph induced by one or several intervals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%