2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-93409-5_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding Cross-Border Collaborative Centres in Biopharma Patent Networks: A Clustering Comparison Approach Based on Adjusted Mutual Information

Abstract: The recent speedy development of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines has underlined the importance of cross-border patent collaboration. This paper uses the latest edition of the REGPAT database from the OECD and constructs the co-applicant patent networks for the fields of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals. We identify the cross-border collaborative regional centres in these patent networks at NUTS3 level using a clustering comparison approach based on adjusted mutual information (AMI). In particular, we measure and compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we propose using clustering comparison in another application: as a way of identifying central nodes in networks. In the previous analysis (Zhu and Gao 2021), we have found that our proposed measure both correlates with and has advantages over the traditional measure of betweenness centrality as it better differentiates cross-border centres from local ones and offers a more uniform distribution of values. Our work also shows that compared to a simple measure of foreign share, AMI gain is more of a global and structural measure and better differentiates the nodes on the top.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, we propose using clustering comparison in another application: as a way of identifying central nodes in networks. In the previous analysis (Zhu and Gao 2021), we have found that our proposed measure both correlates with and has advantages over the traditional measure of betweenness centrality as it better differentiates cross-border centres from local ones and offers a more uniform distribution of values. Our work also shows that compared to a simple measure of foreign share, AMI gain is more of a global and structural measure and better differentiates the nodes on the top.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The development of the AMI gain method is detailed in our previous work (Zhu and Gao 2021). We provide a brief review here: For the constructed network with weighted links, we restrict our focus to the largest components and use the Louvain method (Blondel et al 2008) for community detection.…”
Section: Ami Gain Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of the AMI gain method is detailed in out previous work [25] and has been adapted for this study: First, the original method is based on NUTS3 level region division, while in this paper it's been revised to map to the UK postcode areas. Second, in this study we combine pharmaceuticals and biotechnology patents together.…”
Section: Ami Gain Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definiton of AMI is the same as in the previous work [25]. Algorithm 1 shows the adapted pseudocode of calculating the AMI gain for each node.…”
Section: Ami Gain Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using patent data, regional studies investigated biotechnology cooperation in Brazil ( 22 ), tuberculosis prevention and treatment in Brazil ( 23 ), collaborative innovation in Chinese medicine ( 24 ), the impact of patent cooperation on firm patent output in the pharmaceutical industry in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in China ( 25 ), and the impact of patent cooperation network on small and medium-sized enterprises in the pharmaceutical industry of China 1 , etc., thereby providing guidance for decision-making on regional public health development. On a global scale, Liu et al ( 26 ) investigated the global landscape of patents related to human coronaviruses; and Zhu and Gao ( 27 ) analyzed the global biopharmaceutical patent cooperation network using a clustering comparison approach, and identified cross-border regional collaborative centers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%