2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35515-8_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding Anomalous and Suspicious Files from Directory Metadata on a Large Corpus

Abstract: Abstract:We describe a tool Dirim for automatically finding files on a drive that are anomalous or suspicious, and thus worthy of focus during digital-forensic investigation, based on solely their directory information. Anomalies are found both from comparing overall drive statistics and from comparing clusters of related files using a novel approach of "superclustering" of clusters. Suspicious file detection looks for a set of specific clues. We discuss results of experiments we conducted on a representative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Garfinkel and Migletz [76] develop a tool for automatic metadata extraction from digital evidence. Rowe and Garfinkel [174] develop a tool that uses directory and file metadata to determine anomalous files on a large corpus. The tool uses fiwalk [78] to traverse the corpus and compute statistical characteristics on the numerical metadata and generate 204 output files based on which anomalous files such as misnamed files and duplicate copies of files were identified.…”
Section: "Metadata Includes Information About the Document Or File Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garfinkel and Migletz [76] develop a tool for automatic metadata extraction from digital evidence. Rowe and Garfinkel [174] develop a tool that uses directory and file metadata to determine anomalous files on a large corpus. The tool uses fiwalk [78] to traverse the corpus and compute statistical characteristics on the numerical metadata and generate 204 output files based on which anomalous files such as misnamed files and duplicate copies of files were identified.…”
Section: "Metadata Includes Information About the Document Or File Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the techniques these researchers use apply to our problem. For instance, Rowe and Garfinkel [7] point out that files that have close proximity in creation or modification times can have causal relationships, and they also look for co-occurrence of files that are duplicated in a snapshot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it may be necessary to generate a list of all files that were created at a particular location determined based on the EXIF lat-long information of a digital photograph or determine doctored photographs and group them with their originals or identify the different versions of a document that exist and determine the original (oldest) document using a timeline. This requires an approach which can identify not just identical files [29] but also other forms of file associations. We demonstrate this approach on unknown collections of digital image files and word processing documents.…”
Section: Metadata For Grouping Filesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Document metadata may also record information about where it was created (geo-tagging), number of pages/ slides, formatting type, encoding type and so on. Rowe and Garfinkel [29] have analyzed the same digital corpora govdocs1 file repository [15] to determine anomalous documents. They compute statistical characteristics using directory metadata and identify the top and bottom 5 percentile in the repository as outliers.…”
Section: Document Relationships and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation