Abstract:Purpose
This study aims at measuring the results of the use of an improved and innovative teaching method, specifically designed for supporting the development of students’ entrepreneurship competence, through students’ self-assessment before and after the teaching.
Design/methodology/approach
The teaching methods design was based on the effectuation approach and considering the comprehensive entrepreneurship competence model as theoretical grounding. The teaching methods experimentation took place in three … Show more
“…More recently, Bolzani and Luppi (2021) focused on the assessment of entrepreneurship competence amongst bachelor's and master's level students participating in an extracurricular initiative (a business model challenge); they used pre- and post-test surveys, hence student self-assessment. Similarly, Antonelli et al. (2024) evaluated the development of entrepreneurship competence among university students through pre and post surveys, but also through a control group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Bolzani and Luppi (2021) focused on the assessment of entrepreneurship competence amongst bachelor's and master's level students participating in an extracurricular initiative (a business model challenge); they used pre-and post-test surveys, hence student self-assessment. Similarly, Antonelli et al (2024) evaluated the development of entrepreneurship competence among university students through pre and post surveys, but also through a control group. These last two articles thus only made use of self-assessment strategies, which are an important constituent in the assessment of competence development (Pellerey, 2004;van der Vleuten et al, 2017), but are certainly not the only strategies available.…”
PurposeThis article focuses on the assessment of entrepreneurship competence by selected vocational teachers in Italy. The exploratory research question addresses the extent to which entrepreneurship assessments are competence based, and the research seeks to identify fully fledged assessment programmes with both a formative and summative component, and the use of assessment rubrics. It also explores the extent to which entrepreneurship competence is referred to in school documentation and later assessed, and the tools and strategies used for such assessment.Design/methodology/approachThis case study is part of a larger European research project promoted by Cedefop; in Italy it focused on six selected vocational IVET and CVET programmes and apprenticeship schemes. It used a wide range of instruments to ensure triangulation and multiple perspectives: analysed policy documents and undertook online interviews with experts and policy makers. At VET providers' premises it deployed: analysis of school documents; observations of learning environments; interviews and focus groups with (in schools) teachers, directors and vice directors, learners and alumni (in companies) instructors, company tutors and employers, apprentices and alumni.FindingsAssessment tasks were rarely embedded within fully fledged assessment programmes involving both formative and summative tasks, and assessment rubric for grading. Most of the time, entrepreneurship programmes lacked self-assessment, peer assessment and structured feedback and did not involve learners in the assessment process. Some instructors coached the students, but undertook no clear formative assessment. These findings suggest institutions have a testing culture with regard to assessment, at the level of both policy and practice. In most cases, entrepreneurship competence was not directly assessed, and learning outcomes were only loosely related to entrepreneurship.Research limitations/implicationsOne limitation concerned the selection of the VET providers: these were chosen not on a casual basis, but because they ran programmes that were relevant to the development of entrepreneurship competence.Practical implicationsAt the policy level, there is a need for new guidelines on competence development and assessment in VET, guidelines that are more aligned with educational research on competence development. To ensure the development of entrepreneurship competence, educators need in-service training and a community of practice.Originality/valueSo far, the literature has concentrated on entrepreneurship education at the tertiary level. Little is known about how VET instructors assess entrepreneurship competence. This study updates the picture of policy and practice in Italy, illustrating how entrepreneurship competence is developed in selected IVET and CVET programmes and apprenticeships.
“…More recently, Bolzani and Luppi (2021) focused on the assessment of entrepreneurship competence amongst bachelor's and master's level students participating in an extracurricular initiative (a business model challenge); they used pre- and post-test surveys, hence student self-assessment. Similarly, Antonelli et al. (2024) evaluated the development of entrepreneurship competence among university students through pre and post surveys, but also through a control group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Bolzani and Luppi (2021) focused on the assessment of entrepreneurship competence amongst bachelor's and master's level students participating in an extracurricular initiative (a business model challenge); they used pre-and post-test surveys, hence student self-assessment. Similarly, Antonelli et al (2024) evaluated the development of entrepreneurship competence among university students through pre and post surveys, but also through a control group. These last two articles thus only made use of self-assessment strategies, which are an important constituent in the assessment of competence development (Pellerey, 2004;van der Vleuten et al, 2017), but are certainly not the only strategies available.…”
PurposeThis article focuses on the assessment of entrepreneurship competence by selected vocational teachers in Italy. The exploratory research question addresses the extent to which entrepreneurship assessments are competence based, and the research seeks to identify fully fledged assessment programmes with both a formative and summative component, and the use of assessment rubrics. It also explores the extent to which entrepreneurship competence is referred to in school documentation and later assessed, and the tools and strategies used for such assessment.Design/methodology/approachThis case study is part of a larger European research project promoted by Cedefop; in Italy it focused on six selected vocational IVET and CVET programmes and apprenticeship schemes. It used a wide range of instruments to ensure triangulation and multiple perspectives: analysed policy documents and undertook online interviews with experts and policy makers. At VET providers' premises it deployed: analysis of school documents; observations of learning environments; interviews and focus groups with (in schools) teachers, directors and vice directors, learners and alumni (in companies) instructors, company tutors and employers, apprentices and alumni.FindingsAssessment tasks were rarely embedded within fully fledged assessment programmes involving both formative and summative tasks, and assessment rubric for grading. Most of the time, entrepreneurship programmes lacked self-assessment, peer assessment and structured feedback and did not involve learners in the assessment process. Some instructors coached the students, but undertook no clear formative assessment. These findings suggest institutions have a testing culture with regard to assessment, at the level of both policy and practice. In most cases, entrepreneurship competence was not directly assessed, and learning outcomes were only loosely related to entrepreneurship.Research limitations/implicationsOne limitation concerned the selection of the VET providers: these were chosen not on a casual basis, but because they ran programmes that were relevant to the development of entrepreneurship competence.Practical implicationsAt the policy level, there is a need for new guidelines on competence development and assessment in VET, guidelines that are more aligned with educational research on competence development. To ensure the development of entrepreneurship competence, educators need in-service training and a community of practice.Originality/valueSo far, the literature has concentrated on entrepreneurship education at the tertiary level. Little is known about how VET instructors assess entrepreneurship competence. This study updates the picture of policy and practice in Italy, illustrating how entrepreneurship competence is developed in selected IVET and CVET programmes and apprenticeships.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.