Financing Patterns of Innovative SMEs and the Perception of Innovation Barriers in Germany

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in AbstractWe analyze the role of public support in the financing pattern of R&D in German SMEs and their assessment of financing conditions in the context of other framework conditions for innovation. In Germany, there is a diversity of overall well-funded technology-neutral and technologyspecific programs providing grants to R&D and innovation projects. Different types of SMEs access public funding for R&D and innovation activities to varying degrees. Using an extensive sample of 2,700 German SMEs that participated in public R&D promotion programs during the 2005-2010 period, we identify four groups of companies with different patterns of public and private sources of R&D finance, such as own capital, grants, private and subsidized loans.The firms in our sample are generally positive about public financing of R&D in Germany in 2010. Despite the different funding patterns, we find only slight variations in this assessment across the four groups of subsidized SMEs. Nevertheless, medium-sized R&D companies (often with external equity investment) that have to finance the market introduction of innovations without a track record, appear to suffer from deficiencies in the provision of loans. Further, the companies perceive obstacles to innovation primarily in the non-financial sphere, namely the supply of skilled personnel, market regulation and competition conditions. Therefore, future work on innovation policies for SMEs should put greater emphasis on the non-financial external framework conditions for firm R&D and innovative activities. JEL-Classification: O14, O25, O38, L20Keywords: R&D promotion, Financing of R&D, Small and medium sized enterprises, Barriers to innovation 1 We would like to thank Alexander Eickelpasch for discussions and suggestions.

The Impact of Resource Efficiency Measures on the Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises

“…Following the definition of the Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) in Bonn SME´s are defined as firms employing less than 500 workers with an annual turnover that does not exceed 50 million euros (IfM 2016). On the one hand, small firms might be more flexible and open to new innovation fields but on the other hand, SME´s might be specifically affected by innovation barriers (Tiwari, Buse 2007, Belitz, Lejpras 2014, Ghisetti et al 2015): High fixed innovation costs might reduce the availability of external financing because of high economic risks whereas big firms may finance a failure of an innovation project by the success of other projects. SME´s may be more affected by labor shortage because bigger firms are more attractive for applicants.…”

The Interactive Effect of Government Financial Support and Firms’ Innovative Efforts on Company Growth: A Focus on Climate-Tech SMEs in Korea

“…According to the 2017 climate industry report of the Green Technology Center Korea (GTC-K), most climate-technology firms were small-and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (5820 firms of 6644, 87.6%). Compared to large, established companies, SMEs often have limited access to external research and development (R&D) funding, face difficulties generating economies of scale, and must compete with larger and better funded companies for skilled labor [4,5]. These factors make it more difficult for climate-tech SMEs to attract investment from the private sector because the related market is relatively small and the profitability of climate technology has not been verified.…”

Resources for innovation projects financing in the regional small and medium size enterprises in the Czech Republic

“…Moreover the Czech government arranged for the institutions of financial support which are provided through the state budget. The studies performed in EU countries proved that SMEs which tackled the innovation activities suffer from the deficiencies in the provision of loans (Belitz & Lejpras 2014). On top of that SMEs generally face difficulties in getting access to finance since investors do not prefer making investments in SMEs due to their risky nature of business operations (Gompers & Lerner 2001).…”