2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financing investment in environmentally sound technologies: Foreign direct investment versus foreign debt finance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may contribute to explain why for many years the developing countries have refused to sign international agreements concerning the protection of intellectual property rights, and others have laxly enforced domestic laws and regulations designed for this purpose (Helpman 1993). The international trade models accounting for the effects of an increase of the IPR legal protection on technological transfers from North to South of the world have detected two main channels, by means of which a stronger protection of the IPR might encourage technological progress: a) international trade (trade); b) foreign direct investment (fdi) (Anyangah 2010;Glass, Wu 2007;Glass, Saggi 2002) 6 . Moreover increasing the degree of legal protection of IPR has the effect of stimulating patent application by residents (par) (Allred, Park 2007;Branstetter et al 2006;Parello 2008).…”
Section: International Trade Foreign Direct Investment Patents Applmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may contribute to explain why for many years the developing countries have refused to sign international agreements concerning the protection of intellectual property rights, and others have laxly enforced domestic laws and regulations designed for this purpose (Helpman 1993). The international trade models accounting for the effects of an increase of the IPR legal protection on technological transfers from North to South of the world have detected two main channels, by means of which a stronger protection of the IPR might encourage technological progress: a) international trade (trade); b) foreign direct investment (fdi) (Anyangah 2010;Glass, Wu 2007;Glass, Saggi 2002) 6 . Moreover increasing the degree of legal protection of IPR has the effect of stimulating patent application by residents (par) (Allred, Park 2007;Branstetter et al 2006;Parello 2008).…”
Section: International Trade Foreign Direct Investment Patents Applmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some of these measures are not explicitly aimed at promoting technology-based FDI, but rather directed towards attracting financial capital. Clearly, FDI inflows can be important sources of hardware and software technologies and can contribute to the development of national scientific and organisational capabilities (Diyamett and Mutambla 2015;Anyangah 2010;Chowla 2005;Sawada 2005;World Bank 1993). In fact, FDI is critical for growing African economies and stimulating human development on the continent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…uncertainty on the (steeper) marginal benefit function has greater effect on profit than uncertainty on the (flatter) marginal cost function. Anyanga (2010) compared foreign direct investment (FDI) and debt financing to develop environmentally sound technologies. He found that debt financing fares better than FDI because it requires coping only with adverse selection concerning the firm's own productivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%