2013
DOI: 10.2753/ijp0891-1916420406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financialization and Economic Growth in Developing Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
18

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…In the specific case of Latin America, financialization has, in our view (see also [71]) three central aspects: a new organization of production, a new way of profit appropriation and a change in the behavior of economic agents [72]. The transnationalization of production and the consequent decoupling of demand and supply have led to the growth of imbalances within and between countries and regions.…”
Section: Financialization In the Peripheries Some Peculiarities Regar...mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the specific case of Latin America, financialization has, in our view (see also [71]) three central aspects: a new organization of production, a new way of profit appropriation and a change in the behavior of economic agents [72]. The transnationalization of production and the consequent decoupling of demand and supply have led to the growth of imbalances within and between countries and regions.…”
Section: Financialization In the Peripheries Some Peculiarities Regar...mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Periphery countries have 'adopted' export promotion policies (it is clear that in a world-system sustained by 'new'-and sometimes 'old'-forms of coloniality, the line dividing the decisions 'freely' taken by peripheral countries and those imposed on them-by international financial institutions, their trading partners, the geopolitical and economic hegemonic powers, their own domestic political elites, transnational corporations, international financial markets, their creditors and so on-is, if it exists at all, always tenuous), but they do not always manage to achieve a current account surplus and face difficulties attracting capital flows to balance their external sector. They are therefore forced to offer increasingly higher financial returns and repress real wages [51] in order to compete [72].…”
Section: Financialization In the Peripheries Some Peculiarities Regar...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in 2000, with the further implementation of NAFTA, which was signed in 1994, Mexico adopted financial innovation, creating the conditions for securitization activities and greater involvement of both foreign international banks and corporations. As a result, these foreign companies increased their control over the banking and non-banking sectors such as investment banks, insurance companies and pension funds (Levy-Orlik 2014). The major activity of the foreign companies operating in the Mexico's financial sector was to advance credits; however the availability of more capital did not benefit its economy.…”
Section: Experiences Of Capital Liberalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fall in overall investment spending, those manufacturing industries specialising in exports of high technology have done well, while the traditional manufacturing industries have experienced a sharp decline in exports. The high tech industries are based on the maquiladora structure, which specialises in assembling goods that have strong import content and thus, to increase exports, imports must go up (Levy-Orlik 2014). In Mexico, the banking sector has experienced profound institutional changes as bank ownership was transferred to foreign corporations, who took advantage of oligopolistic banking structures to gain further control over this sector.…”
Section: Experiences Of Capital Liberalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a new but growing body of literature on the financialization experiences of housing markets in EMEs, including Brazil (Klink, ; Klink and Denaldi, ; Sanfelici and Halbert, ; Pereira, ), Mexico (Levy‐Orlik, ), Turkey (Aslan and Dincer, ; Erol, ), China (Wu, ; Theurillat et al ., ), Russia (Badyina, ; Zavisca and Gerber, ), the Eastern European countries (Florea et al, ; Posfai et al ., ) and the peripheral European countries of Iceland, Ireland, Latvia and Estonia (see Saxegaard et al ., ; Bohle, ; , among others). These studies collectively suggest that the narratives of housing financialization in developing countries are different from those in the developed world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%