Financialisation as Monopoly Profit: The Case of US Banking

Abstract

Different economic measures afford different ways of seeing processes of financialisation. In the prototypical case of the US economy, the most compelling evidence of post‐1970s financialisation is found in corporate profits measures. This much has been clear for at least a decade. What remains much less clear, however, is the explanation for the long‐term maintenance and amplification of extreme financial‐sector profitability that financialisation in the United States has and continues to entail. With a specific focus on banking, this article turns to post‐Marxian scholarship on profit rate trends to explain this phenomenon. It argues that limited and declining levels of competition within the US banking sector during recent decades—rooted in high levels of industry concentration, collusive behaviour, and substantial entry barriers—have contributed to sustaining and boosting abnormal sectoral profitability. In doing so, the article theorises financialisation in the United States explicitly in terms of monopoly profit.

From the State to the Shareholder: Rent and the Production of Shareholder Value in Real Estate

“…In residential markets, Wissoker (:553) finds that the “affirmation of these ideas pushed homebuilders to expand, to look for additional ways to cut costs … and to do what was necessary to increase the value of their shares”. Likewise, mergers and acquisitions within the lenders of real estate finance—the banking sector—have helped sustain “abnormal sectoral profitability” for these firms and their shareholders in the era of financialisation (Christophers :864). Intense scrutiny by capital markets means real estate is expected to “perform according to a common standard of shareholder value‐creation” (Rutland :1175), resulting in what Aalbers (:379) notes are projects which “increasingly developed with an investor rather than a user in mind”.…”

“…Yet, in spite of postcrisis financial regulation, there has been what Chronoplouos et al () identify as “profit persistence” in the banking industry. While monopolistic conditions derived from industry concentration, barriers to entry, and collusion have certainly helped banks generate new sources of income (Christophers ), American banking giants like Bank of America, US Bank, PNC Bank, and JP Morgan Chase and a number of smaller community banks have engaged in tax credit investments that offset federal and state taxes while fulfilling federal lending obligations.…”

Room for money or manoeuvre? How green financialization and de-risking shape Zambia’s renewable energy transition

“…On a more abstract level, Van der Zwan (2014) deduces three major avenues of analysis that financialization pursues. Firstly, the emergence of a new regime of accumulation (Christophers 2018;Fine 2010Fine , 2016, which focus on macro-transformations; secondly, the ascendency of the shareholder value orientation (Lazonick 2010;Stockhammer 2012;Mazzucato 2013), which focuses on firms and ownership issues relating to financial markets; and lastly the financialization of daily lives (Martin 2002), which concentrates on the micro-level and explores how broader sections of society are incorporated into the rationales and flows of the financial sphere.…”

Financialization: An Introduction

“…It triggered a debate over the relative weight of financial profits -or 'profit financialization' -in the economy and within non-financial firms (see e.g. Nölke and Perry, 2007;Van Treeck, 2008;Christophers, 2018). Other definitions also signal specific theoretical traditions, as for instance with a Marxist understanding of financialization as the "increasing incorporation of IBC [interest-bearing capital] into the circuits of capital" (Fine, 2013: 62;contra Lapavitsas, 2011).…”