Financial Wealth, Socioemotional Wealth, and IPO Underpricing in Family Firms: A Two-stage Gamble Model

Abstract

There are competing theoretical explanations and conflicting empirical evidence for the initial public offering (IPO) underpricing phenomenon in family firms. The behavioral agency model predicts that loss-averse family firms discount their shares more than nonfamily firms to minimize losses of socioemotional wealth (SEW). Conversely, the endowment effect in prospect theory suggests that family owners maximize their financial wealth (FW) by including SEW in perceptions of firm value and demanding a higher IPO price to relinquish it. We reconcile these seemingly incompatible predictions by examining dynamic properties of the reference point in decision framing. Conceiving IPO pricing as a two-stage gamble, we theorize that initial SEW losses entailed by the listing decision increase the disposition of family owners to underprice IPO shares to possibly offset these losses, or "break even." We thereby advance the behavioral agency model with the aversion to loss realization logic to explain how family owners' decision frames and preferences change during the IPO process, depending on initial losses of current SEW and new expectations of future SEW. Our analysis of 1,807 IPOs in Europe supports our theoretical expectations, clarifying the trade-off between FW and SEW and explicating the dynamic properties of mixed gambles in family firms. 1073

Organizational Goals: Antecedents, Formation Processes and Implications for Firm Behavior and Performance

“…), defined in either financial or non‐financial terms (Kotlar et al . ). Nevertheless, organizational decision‐makers often pay simultaneous attention to multiple goals that are not necessarily uncorrelated or conflicting (Gaba and Joseph ; Greve ; Labianca et al .…”

Innovation in Family Firms: A Systematic Literature Review and Guidance for Future Research

“…) and the trade‐offs between SEW and financial wealth (Kotlar et al . ), to understand their effect on innovation behaviours, priorities and strategies. For instance, a social enterprise that aims to pursue a specific social mission while maintaining economic sustainability, or an international business that might set different goals in each subsidiary, could learn from FF innovation what challenges and opportunities the organization may face.…”

Tracing the Roots of Innovativeness in Family SMEs: The Effect of Family Functionality and Socioemotional Wealth

“…To explore the antecedents of family firm innovativeness, we apply the concept of SEW, a dominant theoretical paradigm (e.g., Berrone et al, 2012;Cennamo, Berrone, Cruz, and Gomez-Mejia, 2012;Kotlar, Signori, De Massis, and Vismara, 2017) defined as the family-firm owners' noneconomic gains deriving from ownership, comprising their aim to: (1) exert influence on the firm, (2) uphold a strong family identity with the firm, (3) preserve binding social ties, (4) maintain emotional attachment, and (5) ensure intrafamily succession (Gomez-Mejia, Haynes, Nunez-Nickel, Jacobson, and Moyano-Fuentes, 2007). Although family firms seek to achieve both economic and noneconomic goals, they are inclined to sacrifice economic gains to maintain their noneconomic utility (Chrisman and Patel, 2012) when taking SEW as their primary reference point (Gomez-Mejia et al, 2007), thus aiming to preserve their SEW (Kammerlander and Ganter, 2015).…”