2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3878(00)00146-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial restraints in the South Korean miracle

Abstract: W e pr ovi de novel em pi r i cal evi dence on t he eff ect s of fi nanci al rest r ai nt s on Sout h Kor ean fi nanci al devel opm ent . The evi dence i s l i nked t o a si m pl e m odel of t he Kor ean banki ng syst em t hat encapsul at es i t s cart el i sed nat ure, whi ch predi ct s a posi t i ve associ at i on bet w een fi nanci al devel opm ent and (i ) t he degree of st at e cont r ol over t he banki ng syst em , (i i ) m i l d repressi on of l endi ng rat es. The m odel al so predi ct s t hat i n t he… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[21] found differing effects of banking sector control on financial development in a number of developing countries, such as India, Nepal, the Republic of Korea, the Philippines, and Thailand. In the case of India, [22] estimated a conditional error correction model for financial deepening, against the use of non-financial measures, [23], in his study of the evaluation of performance of conventional banks in Pakistan and found that financial repression indices (interest rate control index, index of other financial sector restrictions in the form of reserve requirements, minimum liquidity requirements, and directed credit programs) exhibited sig-nificant influence of (−0.0465) on financial deepening. The econometric investigation of the effect of individual repression policies shows that interest rate controls as well as other controls have a significant negative effect on financial deepening equal respectively to −0.0154 and −0.0083.…”
Section: Justification Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] found differing effects of banking sector control on financial development in a number of developing countries, such as India, Nepal, the Republic of Korea, the Philippines, and Thailand. In the case of India, [22] estimated a conditional error correction model for financial deepening, against the use of non-financial measures, [23], in his study of the evaluation of performance of conventional banks in Pakistan and found that financial repression indices (interest rate control index, index of other financial sector restrictions in the form of reserve requirements, minimum liquidity requirements, and directed credit programs) exhibited sig-nificant influence of (−0.0465) on financial deepening. The econometric investigation of the effect of individual repression policies shows that interest rate controls as well as other controls have a significant negative effect on financial deepening equal respectively to −0.0154 and −0.0083.…”
Section: Justification Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent empirical analysis by Arestis and Demetriades (1997) and Demetriades and Luintel (2001) indicated that in South Korea, financial repression policies had played a positive role. The results of Li (2001) also indicated a positive effect of financial repression on growth performance in the case of China.…”
Section: Earlier Financial Repression Models and Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is quite common to find that the real interest rate has a small positive effect on financial development, there is also evidence to suggest that the direct effects of 'repressive' policies on financial development are sometimes positive and quite large. Demetriades and Luintel (2001) provide time-series evidence from South Korea -one of the fastest growing economies in the world -in which an index of financial repression is found to have a large positive effect on financial development. They explain this finding by arguing that the Korean banking system behaved like a cartel when interest rates were deregulated.…”
Section: Policy Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%