Financial Regulatory Harmonization and the Globalization of Finance

Abstract

Abstract:In the globalizing economy, national policymakers are often forced to accept the challenge of financial integration. Faced with the potentially destabilizing effects of international financial markets, they have to strengthen financial regulation, importing international best practices and aligning domestic with foreign regulation to avoid destabilizing phenomena of regulatory arbitrage. This paper explores the main features of the ongoing process of worldwide financial regulatory convergence and the role played by the global dissemination of financial standards and codes. It analyzes the reasons behind the generalized acceptance of international best practices and the limits of the standards and codes approach to financial regulatory harmonization. Convergence of financial regulation across jurisdictions has been considered, at times a precondition of market integration, at times a consequence, but always a key feature of financial integration. In the last decades the relationship between financial integration and regulatory harmonization, in its various guises, has changed as a result of the accelerating pace of financial globalization. Not only have capital flows increased enormously, but also the provision of financial services across different jurisdictions has grown as a result of the expansion of financial intermediaries internationally and of the direct supply of financial services to foreign entities, as in the case of foreign listings. It can be argued that the increased provision of financial services and products across national boundaries has already exercised a disciplining effect through stiffer competition. Still, the integration of financial products and services and that of financial regulatory frameworks represent two different aspects of the same process, the globalization of finance. They move together but often at different speeds. JEL classification numbers: G21, G28Although market forces can promote regulatory harmonization, regulatory developments should not be left to market forces alone. Market forces and self-regulatory agencies share well known problems. Coordination failures associated with market-led initiatives can generate negative systemic externalities, attracting capital toward less regulated systems and institutions or generating forms of competition in laxity that may undermine financial stability. In addition, the cost of financia l regulation and supervision may be too high for small countries a potentially critical issue in the development of sound standards in a world where the number of independent jurisdictions has almost trebled since World War II. Overall, welfare considerations related to the presence of systemic externalities and to the high cost of public goods suggest that regulatory harmonization should not be left to market forces alone.From the perspectives of the national policymaker and the analyst of international financial relations t he relevant question then becomes how financial regulatory harmonization should be pursued. How should a specific ...

Investing for the Environment? The Limits of the UN Principles of Responsible Investment

“…As such, the case of NSMD environmental governance systems has been played out in the globalized consumer markets. With the increasing importance of financial markets since the 1980s, however, flows of finance have been recognized as the predominant force of market globalization (Jordan and Majnoni 2002) and the debate has shifted to the role of nation-states within this new setting (e.g. Stulz 2005).…”

Reporting Performance: Comprehensive Income and its Components

“…The idea is misleading because technical rules can be devised to achieve covert political ends (Horn, 1995), a point Jordan and Majnoni (2002) acknowledge indirectly (p. 5-6). As is already well recognized in accounting, accounting standard setting is a highly political activity in which conceptual and technical coherence are 'tangential matters' (Gerboth, 1987, p. 2).…”

“…This date coincides with that announced recently by Australia for the full adoption of IFRSs (Alfredson, 2003;Haswell and McKinnon, 2003;Howieson and Langfield-Smith, 2003;Miller, 2003). Compliance with IFRSs will be required by 2007, with voluntary adoption from 2005. between different technical codes and standards, and incompatibility of technical standards with different countries' cultures and laws (Jordan and Majnoni, 2002). The IASB's reporting performance project reveals additional weaknesses.…”

The Financial Crisis: A Wake-up Call for Strengthening Regional Monitoring of Financial Markets and Regional Coordination of Financial Sector Policies?

“…Several countries-for various reasons, including those related to small size and development strategies based on providing favorable regulatory, supervisory, and tax terms for financial integration-opted out, raising issues of legitimacy and representativeness (Jordan and Majnoni 2002 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Within this process of financial globalization there have been several initiatives for regional integration that by their very nature aim at deeper integration compared to the global level (ECB 2004). The most important of them has been European integration, where monetary integration, i.e., the introduction of the euro, coincided with the end of the emerging market crisis period in the late 1990s.…”

“…subsidiarity, and mutual recognition (Jordan and Majnoni 2002). Since then, however, financial and monetary integration have been reinforcing each other, with financial integration fostering the process of monetary union, and monetary union strengthening efforts to increase financial integration.…”