Proceedings of the 2nd Southeast Asian Academic Forum on Sustainable Development (SEA-AFSID 2018) 2021
DOI: 10.2991/aebmr.k.210305.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial Performance of Islamic and Conventional Mutual Funds in Indonesia Stock Exchange

Abstract: The purpose of this research is to analyze the comparison of performance between Islamic mutual funds and conventional mutual funds using the calculation of return, Sharpe, and Treynor and to find out which types of mutual funds are the best in 2015-2017. The analysis used in the research is a comparative descriptive method with a quantitative approach. The results of this research indicate that the majority of conventional mutual funds are superior to Islamic mutual funds in 2015-2017, although there are seve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it explores their risk and return characteristics in the context of PSX to formulate strategies for fund managers and investors. The performance of mutual funds can be assessed by calculating returns or through the assessment of risk (Pratama et al, 2018). Furthermore, their performance is also dependent upon the fund managers' appetite for risk as well as their management style.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it explores their risk and return characteristics in the context of PSX to formulate strategies for fund managers and investors. The performance of mutual funds can be assessed by calculating returns or through the assessment of risk (Pratama et al, 2018). Furthermore, their performance is also dependent upon the fund managers' appetite for risk as well as their management style.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%