2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial Openness and Productivity

Abstract: Summary. -Financial openness is often associated with higher rates of economic growth. We show that the impact of openness on factor productivity growth is more important than the effect on capital growth. This explains why the growth effects of liberalization appear to be largely permanent, not temporary. We attribute these permanent liberalization effects to the role financial openness plays in stock market and banking sector development, and to changes in the quality of institutions. We find some indirect e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
5
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirically, these variables indeed seem to be related. In a recent cross‐country study, Bekaert, Harvey, and Lundblad (2011) find a strong positive relationship between the private credit to GDP ratio—which within our model could be interpreted as the bank share, z—and the risk of a banking sector crisis. Moreover, they find some evidence of a positive relation between market liberalization—which within our model could be interpreted as financial flexibility, λ—and the risk of a bank crisis, although the costs of such crises are outweighed by the benefits of increased liberalization.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Empirically, these variables indeed seem to be related. In a recent cross‐country study, Bekaert, Harvey, and Lundblad (2011) find a strong positive relationship between the private credit to GDP ratio—which within our model could be interpreted as the bank share, z—and the risk of a banking sector crisis. Moreover, they find some evidence of a positive relation between market liberalization—which within our model could be interpreted as financial flexibility, λ—and the risk of a bank crisis, although the costs of such crises are outweighed by the benefits of increased liberalization.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…The literature on the determinants of world market integration (e.g., Kose, Otrok, and Prasad (2012), Bekaert et al. ()) explores the effect of various institutional and financial development indicators (such as creditor's rights, property rights institutions, private credit, etc.). Since most of the usual proxies for institutional efficiency exhibit little within‐country variability, they are captured by the country‐pair fixed effects.…”
Section: Financial Sector Legislative‐regulatory Harmonization and Oumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the broader literature that quantifies the effects of financial integration on economic growth, output volatility, and risk sharing, see Bekaert, Harvey, and Lundblad (, , ), Bekaert et al. (), Henry (), Kose et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strand of studies explains that positive impacts of market liberalization are only visible under a developed financial system and improved institutions (see Fuchs-Schundeln & Funke, 2003;Galindo et al, 2007;Huang & Huang, 2008;Kaminsky & Schmukler, 2008;Chen, 2009;Ayhan Kose et al, 2011;Bekaert et al, 2011). This strand of studies explains that positive impacts of market liberalization are only visible under a developed financial system and improved institutions (see Fuchs-Schundeln & Funke, 2003;Galindo et al, 2007;Huang & Huang, 2008;Kaminsky & Schmukler, 2008;Chen, 2009;Ayhan Kose et al, 2011;Bekaert et al, 2011).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%