2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial Interventions to Improve Screening in Primary Care: A Systematic Review

Samantha Matthews,
Nabeel Qureshi,
Jonathan S. Levin
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 78 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the further incorporation of value-based care models and pay for performance (P4P) may help alleviate the discrepancies amongst different insurance holders. Although many systematic reviews have found little evidence that P4P improves patient outcomes, it has shown improvements in health processes, particularly screening rates [ 46 ]. Value-based care models and P4P studies have not been attempted with lung cancer screening using LDCT, however, it has been widely shown to be very underutilized for screening [ 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the further incorporation of value-based care models and pay for performance (P4P) may help alleviate the discrepancies amongst different insurance holders. Although many systematic reviews have found little evidence that P4P improves patient outcomes, it has shown improvements in health processes, particularly screening rates [ 46 ]. Value-based care models and P4P studies have not been attempted with lung cancer screening using LDCT, however, it has been widely shown to be very underutilized for screening [ 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%