2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial intermediaries’ instability and euro area macroeconomic dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A first strand of the literature relies on a two-step approach: an event-study, typically conducted at high frequency 3 , is first used to estimate the impact of policy interventions on a financial variable (typically a long-term rate), then plugged in an estimated macroeconomic model to derive their impact on prices and output. Examples of this approach include for instance Chung, Laforte, Reifschneider, andWilliams (2011), Baumeister andBenati (2013) and Liu, Theodoridis, Mumtaz, and Zanetti (2019) in the U.S., and Altavilla, Giannone, and Lenza (2016), Lhuissier (2017) and Rostagno, Altavilla, Carboni, Lemke, Motto, Saint Guilhem, and Yiangou (2019) in the context of the euro area. This strategy crucially relies for the identification on the interpretation of high frequency changes in the price of market instruments around policy announcements, which can raise its own questions (see, for instance, Wright (2019) on the identification of APP, Andrade and Ferroni (2020) and Miranda-Agrippino and Ricco (forthcoming) on whether these changes are really unpredictable, and Swanson (2020) on the interpretation of high frequency surprises).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first strand of the literature relies on a two-step approach: an event-study, typically conducted at high frequency 3 , is first used to estimate the impact of policy interventions on a financial variable (typically a long-term rate), then plugged in an estimated macroeconomic model to derive their impact on prices and output. Examples of this approach include for instance Chung, Laforte, Reifschneider, andWilliams (2011), Baumeister andBenati (2013) and Liu, Theodoridis, Mumtaz, and Zanetti (2019) in the U.S., and Altavilla, Giannone, and Lenza (2016), Lhuissier (2017) and Rostagno, Altavilla, Carboni, Lemke, Motto, Saint Guilhem, and Yiangou (2019) in the context of the euro area. This strategy crucially relies for the identification on the interpretation of high frequency changes in the price of market instruments around policy announcements, which can raise its own questions (see, for instance, Wright (2019) on the identification of APP, Andrade and Ferroni (2020) and Miranda-Agrippino and Ricco (forthcoming) on whether these changes are really unpredictable, and Swanson (2020) on the interpretation of high frequency surprises).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is broad agreement that overall the ECB programmes were effective in easing sovereign spreads, with some variations regarding their estimated respective contributions (Falagiarda and Reitz, 2015, Szczerbowicz, 2015, Gibson et al, 2016, Lhuissier, 2017, Krishnamurthy et al, 2018, De Santis, 2019. However, views differ more regarding the role of the "redenomination risk" (i.e.…”
Section: The Sovereign Debt Crisis and Ecb Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 See, for example, Lhuissier (2017) and Lhuissier and Tripier (2019), for applications of such a method in the context of multivariate-equation Markov-switching models. 3 Albert and Chib (1993) develop a Gibbs sampling for AR time series subject to Markov mean and variance shifts.…”
Section: A Gibbs Samplermentioning
confidence: 99%