Financial Elder Abuse Through the Lens of the Bystander Intervention Model: Table 1.

Gilhooly, Mary; Dalley, Gillian; Gilhooly, K. J.; Sullivan, Mary P.; Harries, Priscilla; Levi, Michael; Kinnear, Deborah; Davies, Miranda

doi:10.1093/ppar/prv028

Cited by 11 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Bystander Intervention Model provides a framework for understanding the process concerned persons utilize to decide to intervene or not (Gilhooly et al, 2016). But the ability of victims' friends to be supportive may be impeded by their own debilitating emotions (Ahrens & Campbell, 2000).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

When Helping Hurts: Nonabusing Family, Friends, and Neighbors in the Lives of Elder Mistreatment Victims

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

When Helping Hurts: Nonabusing Family, Friends, and Neighbors in the Lives of Elder Mistreatment Victims

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…3) assume personal responsibility; 4) choose an intervention strategy; and 5) take action (Latanè & Darley, 1970). BIM has been applied across multiple contexts, including preventing elder financial abuse (Gilhooly et al, 2013(Gilhooly et al, , 2016 and reducing prejudice and discrimination (Ashburn-Nardo et al, 2008;Nelson et al, 2011). There is evidence that BIM contributes to behavior change and mitigation of sexual assault/violence (e.g., Burn, 2009), drunk driving (e.g., Buckley et al, 2016), bullying and cyberbullying (e.g., Eldridge & Jenkins, 2020;Pozzoli et al, 2012), intimate partner violence (e.g., McMahon & Dick, 2011), and self-harm and suicide behaviors (e.g., Hill et al, 2022;Worsteling & Keating, 2022).…”

Section: Bystander Intervention Model (Bim)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Bystander interventions for promotion and prevention: Applying promotion science, motivation science, and behavioral science to upstanding

McCarty¹,

Arnold²,

Booker³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The bystander intervention paradigm consists of upstanders preventing, mitigating, or responding to harm. The bystander intervention model (BIM) captures the decision-making process of bystanders: 1) notice harm; 2) interpret the situation; 3) assume responsibility; 4) select a strategy; and 5) take action (Latané & Darley, 1970). BIM has been applied to situations of safety (e.g., sexual assault, violence, cyber/bullying) and health (e.g., physical health, mental health). However, these bystander prevention opportunities do not reflect the full range of bystander opportunities, including promotion opportunities whereby upstanders can affirm desirable, safety-promoting or health-promoting behaviors. In this theoretical article, we adapt the prevention-oriented BIM by introducing promotion-oriented concepts associated with the intervention scope of promotion science, promotive focus of motivation science, and positive reinforcement of behavioral science. We propose the upstanding for promotion-prevention (UPP) model whereby promotion and prevention upstanders: 1) notice a promotion or a prevention opportunity; 2) interpret the situational degree of benefit or degree of harm; 3) assume responsibility as an ideal opportunity to enhance benefit or an obligation to stop harm; 4) select a promotion or prevention strategy; and 5) take action as an upstander using promotive or preventive prosocial bystander behavior. Additionally, we provide examples of UPP applications for safety (peace promotion – bullying prevention in schools) and health (health promotion – disease prevention in communities). Ultimately, we aim to advance a paradigm shift toward promotion upstanding, implicating bystander typologies, programs, and practices.

show abstract

“…Overall, this financial elder abuse (FEA) appears to have gained currency as it is thoroughly conceptualized in Gilhooly et al (2016). The authors examine FEA within the analytical framework provided by the bystander intervention model.…”

Section: Existing Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

‘They withdrew all I was worth’

Tade

Adeniyi

2017

International Review of Victimology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A major downside of the cashless policy introduced by the Central Bank of Nigeria in 2014 is pervasive automated teller machine (ATM) frauds. While fraudsters gain, the life chances of victims are affected. Previous studies in Nigeria had not investigated the effect of ATM frauds on victims' life chances. Data were generated through in-depth interviews with victims of ATM fraud. Findings show victims suffered post fraud trauma and often depended on friends, parents and relatives to survive the trauma. The reaction of banks to customers' victimization was unfavorable and unhelpful in compensating the financial losses of customers. We recommend better internal controls for banks and implementation of mechanisms to govern trust and protect customers from victimization.

show abstract

Financial Elder Abuse Through the Lens of the Bystander Intervention Model: Table 1.

Cited by 11 publications

References 18 publications

When Helping Hurts: Nonabusing Family, Friends, and Neighbors in the Lives of Elder Mistreatment Victims

When Helping Hurts: Nonabusing Family, Friends, and Neighbors in the Lives of Elder Mistreatment Victims

Bystander interventions for promotion and prevention: Applying promotion science, motivation science, and behavioral science to upstanding

‘They withdrew all I was worth’

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About