Financial Development and Carbon Emissions: Analyzing the Role of Financial Risk, Renewable Energy Electricity, and Human Capital for China

Abstract

This study introduces the role of financial risk index and renewable energy electricity output along with financial development and human capital as new determinants of carbon emissions and uses updated time-series data from 1988–2018 for China, employing novel econometric approaches, i.e., Narayan and Popp unit root test with structural breaks, Maki cointegration, and frequency domain causality test for long, short, and medium run causality. The empirical outcome shows that improvement in human capital index and rising shares of renewable energy in electricity output help to limit carbon emissions. In contrast, gross domestic product, financial risk index, and structural break of 2001 increase carbon emissions. Moreover, structural break year of 2008 and financial development index reduces carbon emissions. The negative association between financial development and carbon emissions supports the positive school of thoughts of financial development which promotes sustainable environment. This study recommends promotion of quality human capital and green financial development along with increasing the shares of renewable energy in electricity for achieving China 2030 climate targets of reducing pollution.

Environmental dilemma and sustainable development of resource-based cities: A case study from northeast china

“…Similar findings can be found in Zhang M. et al (2022), and Zheng and Ge (2022). Many scholars support this view and argue that China's achievement of carbon peak and carbon neutrality depends on RBC's low-carbon development (Ma et al, 2021;Guo, 2021;Liao et al, 2022). According to statistics, RBCs consume 60% of national energy (Fong et al, 2008;Zhang H. et al, 2022).…”

Investigating the potential role of innovation and clean energy in mitigating the ecological footprint in N11 countries

“…For instance, Tamazian et al (2009) for Brazil, Russia, India, and China, Islam et al (2013) for Malaysia, Lee et al (2015) for 25 OECD nations, Saidi and Mbarek (2017) for nineteen emerging nations, Zaidi et al (2019) for a set of countries, and Guo (2021) for China found that financial development reduces environmental contamination.…”

Towards unlocking the chain of sustainable development in the BRICS economies: Analysing the role of economic complexity and financial risk

“…The findings indicate that the FR indices have a monotonically rising impact on CO 2 emissions and, consequently lower EQ across the whole sample. Using revised time‐series data for China between 1988 and 2018, Guo (2021) looks at the role of financial risk as a new driver of CO 2 . The author employs unique econometric methodologies such as the frequency domain causality test and Maki cointegration.…”