2018
DOI: 10.1111/joca.12187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial Decisions and Financial Capabilities in the Andean Region

Abstract: This paper analyzes the importance of numerical abilities, conscientiousness, and financial literacy for individuals' financial decision making and participation in formal financial markets. Our analysis is based on the Financial Capabilities Survey, which was applied in four countries of the Andean Region: Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru. The empirical analysis underlines the centrality of numerical abilities, different subfacets of conscientiousness (propensity to plan, perseverance, and scrupulosity), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(56 reference statements)
2
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the surveyed individuals show a low level of financial knowledge, given that only 24.8% of them answered this question correctly, with no significant difference between people insured and not insured. This result contrasts with studies in other Latin American economies where, on average, individuals responded with at least some knowledge to questions about inflation, probably due to having experienced continuous and drastic inflation episodes (Roa, Garrón et al, 2019). Nevertheless, the difference in means test (see Table S1 in Appendix 2 in the online supplementary materials) confirms that those who experienced inflationary episodes (55 years old and over) have a better notion of the concept of inflation than those who were younger or unborn when such episodes took place.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the surveyed individuals show a low level of financial knowledge, given that only 24.8% of them answered this question correctly, with no significant difference between people insured and not insured. This result contrasts with studies in other Latin American economies where, on average, individuals responded with at least some knowledge to questions about inflation, probably due to having experienced continuous and drastic inflation episodes (Roa, Garrón et al, 2019). Nevertheless, the difference in means test (see Table S1 in Appendix 2 in the online supplementary materials) confirms that those who experienced inflationary episodes (55 years old and over) have a better notion of the concept of inflation than those who were younger or unborn when such episodes took place.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…A couple of personality traits variables were constructed from the survey. Diligence or grit, a personality trait related to conscientiousness, constitutes a key element in explaining good financial behaviors (Roa, Garrón et al, 2019). To measure this, we used the Short Grit Scale (Grit‐S) developed by Duckworth and Quinn (2009).…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerical literacy is defined as the ability to process basic probability and numerical concepts (Fagerlin et al, 2007 ; Peters et al, 2016 ). Numeracy has been studied many times in the financial context both as a component of financial literacy (French and McKillop, 2016 ; Bannier and Schwarz, 2018 ) and as a concept that is distinct from literacy (Banks and Oldfield, 2007 ; Cole et al, 2011 ; Roa et al, 2019 ). It is well established that numeracy has a profound impact on financial decisions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, earlier research on financial education and knowledge often examined aggregate-level outcomes via analyses of secondary datasets (e.g. Allgood and Walstad, 2013;Herd et al, 2012;Riitsalu and Murakas, 2019;Roa et al, 2019;Seay and Robb, 2013;Tang et al, 2015;Wagner and Walstad, 2019), but not their interaction with disclosure readability on individual-level outcomes, such as product evaluation or decision satisfaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%