Financial Crisis and Corporate Social Responsible Mutual Fund Flows

Abstract

Abstract:In this paper, we investigate investment flows into mutual funds that hold more high corporate social responsible stocks (top CSR funds) vs. mutual funds that hold more low corporate social responsible stocks (bottom CSR funds). Using a large sample of equity mutual funds spanning 2003-2012, we find that top CSR funds on average receive about 5% less investment per annum compared to the other funds; whereas bottom CSR funds receive about 5.6% more investments. These relative negative and positive flows into the top and bottom CSR funds respectively were larger during the pre-financial crisis period (2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007). This trend, however, reversed during the financial crisis (2008)(2009). Top CSR funds attracted about 8.7% more investments during the financial crisis compared to the pre-crisis period; whereas bottom CSR funds received about 9.8% less investment. This higher investment into the top CSR funds during the crisis seems to have disappeared during the post-crisis period (2009)(2010)(2011)(2012). Additional analysis shows that the corporate social ratings of top CSR funds improved through the crisis, whereas it deteriorated for the bottom CSR funds. Our findings are consistent with the "flight to quality" phenomenon observed in financial markets during market crises, indicating that investors perceive top CSR fund investments as relatively safe or of higher quality and hence, invest more in them during financial crises.

Socially Responsible Investing as a Competitive Strategy for Trading Companies in Times of Upheaval Amid COVID-19: Evidence from Spain

“…This is because, when the crisis is over, customers will have a better perception of firms and will have a greater propensity to purchase their products or services. Hence, our results confirm that CSR activities build up the social trust of organisations (Parida and Wang 2018).…”

Does green innovation affect the financial performance of Multilatinas? The moderating role of ISO 14001 and R&D investment

“…Firms that implement ISO 14001 are better able to survive in national and international contexts due to increased legitimacy and greater business value (Parida & Wang, 2018). We can thus extend institutional theory to argue that Multilatinas seek legitimacy by responding to the pressures (mimetic, regulatory and coercive) in their institutional context.…”

Valuation of Environmental Management Standard ISO 14001: Evidence from an Emerging Market

“…Suchman (1995) explains that as per the institutional theory, firms adopt ISO 14001 to reinforce the precision of their operations in a certain defined set of rules, guidelines, principles, customs, values, or norms. Firms take different initiatives to build their reputations among different key stakeholders and achieve legitimacy that helps firms to survive in domestic and international environments and increases their business values (Parida and Wang 2018;Mellahi et al 2016). These strategies help firms in their survival and avoid regulatory burdens.…”