2015
DOI: 10.4148/1944-9771.1082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial Credit Outcomes of IDA Participation: Longitudinal Findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the third sub‐study, Birkenmaier et al (2014a) measured outcomes 3 years after baseline measure on the treatment ( n = 79) and comparison groups ( n = 85), for a total sample of n = 164. The study authors did not compare pre‐test differences on outcomes or demographics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the third sub‐study, Birkenmaier et al (2014a) measured outcomes 3 years after baseline measure on the treatment ( n = 79) and comparison groups ( n = 85), for a total sample of n = 164. The study authors did not compare pre‐test differences on outcomes or demographics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven measured credit score: Parks Opportunity Program [Collins & Nafzinger, 2019; Gons, 2013; Wiedrich et al, 2014]; Credit Building [Birkenmaier et al, 2012, 2014a, 2014b]; Modestino et al, 2019; Moulton et al, 2015; Roder, 2016; Smith et al, 2017; Theodos et al, 2016.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Three large longitudinal studies, "The American Dream Demonstration Project” (ADD) (Grinstein-Weiss et al, 2008, 2012, 2013a, 2015; Han, Grinstein‐Weiss, & Sherraden, 2009; Huang, 2010; Huang et al, 2016; Lombe & Sherraden, 2008; Mills, Gale, Patterson, & Apostolov, 2006), the “Credit Building in Individual Development Account (IDA) Programs” (Birkenmaier et al, 2012; 2014a; 2014b), and the “Assets for Independence” program (also known as the “Building Savings for Success” program) (Mills et al, 2016; Ratcliffe, McKernan, Mills, Pergamit, & Braga, 2019), focused on matched savings accounts. In addition, one unrelated matched savings account study (Leckie, Hui, Tattrie, Robson, & Voyer, 2010a) was also included in the study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%