Financial conflict resolution model in BOT contracts using bargaining game theory

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to determine the optimal value of concession period length in combination with capital structure in build–operate–transfer (BOT) contracts, based on direct negotiation procurement and considering the conflicting financial interests of different parties involved in the project. Design/methodology/approach The financial model of a BOT project is developed considering all the influencing factors. Then, fuzzy set theory is used to take into account the existing risks and uncertainties. Bilateral bargaining game based on alternating-offers protocol is applied between the government and the sponsor to divide project financial benefit considering the lender’s requirements. Finally, concession period and equity level will be determined simultaneously according to the sponsor’s and government’s share of project financial benefit and the lender’s requirements. Findings The proposed model is implemented on a real case study, and a fair and efficient agreement on concession period length and capital structure is achieved between the government and the sponsor considering the lender’s requirements. It is revealed that being the first proposer in the bargaining process will affect the concession period length; however, it will not affect the equity level. Moreover, it is shown that considering income tax as a part of government’s financial benefit increases the length of concession period. Research limitations/implications The presented model concentrates on direct negotiation procurement in BOT projects where the sponsor and government bargain on dividing financial benefits of project. It is assumed that the product/service price is determined before according to market analysis or users’ affordability. All the revenue of project during concession period is assumed to belong to the sponsor. Practical implications The proposed model provides a practical tool to aid BOT participants to reach a fair and efficient agreement on concession period and capital structure. This could prevent failing or prolonging the negotiation and costly renegotiation. Originality/value By investigation of previous studies, it is revealed that none of them can determine the optimal value of concession period length and capital structure simultaneously considering the BOT negotiation process and different financial interests of parties involved in the project. The proposed model presents a new approach to determine the financial variables considering the conflicting interests of involved parties. The other novelty aspects of the presented model are as follows: introducing a new approach for calculating the sponsor and the government’s share of project financial benefit that will affect the determination of the concession period length and considering the effect of existing risks and uncertainties on final agreement between the involved parties using fuzzy set theory.

Critical Factors Influencing the Performance of Highway Projects: An Empirical Evaluation

“…Currently, the major challenge in Indian road construction projects is an encroachment on the right of way, acquisition of land, and disputes between contracting parties, though the scope of such conflicts was limited to the maintenance and relaying of village road projects. The procurement selection for strategic construction, e.g., major highways and expressways, are handled through the use of the built, operate, and transfer method [5,11]. However, from the information received through the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI), over 35% of road/highway construction projects were delayed due to claims and counter claims, and approximately 10% were subjected to arbitration.…”

“…This is due to a lack of correct information visibility, which contributes to the industry's tendency toward decreased profit margins and poorer productivity [4]. As a result, highway construction projects have been vulnerable to a variety of delay-causing issues such as pollution on the job site, supplier insolvency during construction, logistic failure, and community opposition, to name a few [5]. In addition, the lack of transparency and information exchange in this industry has had an impact on productivity [6][7][8].…”

Dispute resolution methods adopted by contractors during COVID-19 in Eastern Cape South Africa: A Case Study

“…The game theory conceptualisation in dispute resolution has helped make negotiations more structured by bringing both parties on the same page (Beltran, 2020). Therefore, to understand the application of justice in an unforeseen circumstance like COVID-19, it is imperative to dissect and conceptualise the social exchange theory in link with the equity theory (Bayat et al 2019). A negotiator's adaption of these concepts brings clarity to the entire process.…”

Innovation and Development of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Capital Market Based on Fintech

“…Technological finance is an effective means to break monopoly by encouraging innovation in economic competition during the industrialization period [9][10]. The first is to encourage innovation to build an effective means to break the monopoly of the industry from scratch and to fill the shortcomings of development; the second is to encourage innovation to catalyze the growth of the industry and to break the effective means of scale monopoly; the third is to encourage innovation and build technological transformation Mechanism, form new technologies and new industries to eliminate traditional products and technologies, and build effective means for backward countries and regions to take advantage of the latecomers [11][12].…”