2015
DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2015.1019043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial challenges of the nexus: pathways for investment in water, energy and agriculture in the Arab world

Abstract: The Water-Energy -Food (WEF) nexus is a development challenge in the Arab world, particularly in the 'core nexus countries' with low to mid-incomes in which limited water endowments permit agricultural production, such as Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Lebanon, Algeria, Sudan and Jordan. The WEF nexus is often conceptualized in mere technocratic terms, yet politics matter in the implementation of projects that address it. Internalizing hydrological externalities or leaving them as they are and financing them as a pu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant efforts should be also made by policy makers regarding identification of advanced water resource management to promote water saving irrigation, e.g., remote sensing and satellite imagery are useful to identify losses in agricultural productivity by assessing agricultural water use, which supports better agricultural planning [78]. Besides, a number of policy instruments, such as pricing strategy, economic sanctions, financial subsidies, etc., may give rise to internalization of the external cost of water, thus to drive development of less water intensive industries and services [7,79].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant efforts should be also made by policy makers regarding identification of advanced water resource management to promote water saving irrigation, e.g., remote sensing and satellite imagery are useful to identify losses in agricultural productivity by assessing agricultural water use, which supports better agricultural planning [78]. Besides, a number of policy instruments, such as pricing strategy, economic sanctions, financial subsidies, etc., may give rise to internalization of the external cost of water, thus to drive development of less water intensive industries and services [7,79].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (Keulertz & Woertz, , p. 31), “agro‐investments in developing countries, have been identified as a ‘new frontier’ of agriculture by introducing modern management and production technologies”. LSLA are particularly a popular strategy by state and non‐state actors, especially from three major groups including Asian countries, (e.g., China and South Korea), western financial investors, and water scarce MENA economies, especially the Gulf countries (Keulertz & Woertz, ). As shown by the “Land Matrix” data, half of the top 10 countries that acquired the most farmland between 2000 and 2016 were major grain‐consuming countries in Asia mostly from GCC, accounting for about 40% of the overseas farmland traded (Lin, ).…”
Section: Scarcity Narratives and Virtual Water Trade In Mena Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, they [38] highlight the need for "a 'poly-centric' and multi-level governance system that has been described as an 'institutional tripod' involving water users, states and markets". The "institutional tripod" can be criticized from different perspectives such as diversity and power inequities of users within sectors [39][40][41][42][43] and competing sectors [44][45][46], market failure and the responsibility of markets for the water crisis [47,48] as well as states institutionalizing inequities through water rights reforms [42,[49][50][51].…”
Section: Water Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%