In 2015 there were 1091 independent schools in Australia servicing 587,000 students and their families. Forty four percent of their $9.5 billion recurrent income was provided by government grants, with the remaining fifty six percent provided by parents and other private sources. Capital investment in new buildings and equipment was funded fourteen percent from government grants and eighty six percent from private funds (ISCA, 2016) include debt which is estimated to be $4 billion for the sector (ASBA/Somerset, 2016).School closures have an adverse effect on social good and undermine consumer confidence in the independent schools' sector. The consequences include disruption to the students' education and loss of public confidence in the sector. Governments (State and Federal) are very sensitive to these failures as they are often a catalyst to expressions of concern about the accountability for government funds expended on the schools, the ongoing funding of non-government schools and paradoxically the pressure put on government schools to absorb both children from schools that fail and children whose parents have lost confidence in the independent system. The qualitative research methodology adopted for this study included the identification of the major stakeholders who are concerned with the financial sustainability of independent schools in Australia and the carrying out face to face semi structured interviews with a sample of 17 stakeholder representatives. The sample frame included representatives from banks, federal and state government, school owners, managers and governors and a parent association.iii There were six major findings from this research. First, there was common agreement between the interviewees as to which financial stakeholders were concerned with the financial sustainability of an independent school. Second, it supported the existing research that stakeholders are as interested in the non-financial attributes as they are in the financial attributes of independent schools when making an assessment of the school's financial sustainability. Third, the stakeholders confirmed the importance Financial attributes and in particular of a strong operating surplus (profit) in order to fund facility reinvestment, debt servicing and also replenish cash reserves. Fourth, Leadership and management are important attributes of financial sustainability. Fifth, stakeholders definition of a financially sustainable independent school identified a mixture of non-financial and financial factors. Sixth, although there was a significant level of agreement among the stakeholders concerning the attributes of a financially sustainable independent school, there were some differences between stakeholders as to the relative importance placed on some factors.