2002
DOI: 10.1007/s001530100110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finality regained: A coalgebraic study of Scott-sets and multisets

Abstract: In this paper we study iterated circular multisets in a coalgebraic framework. We will produce two essentially di erent universes of such s e t s. The unisets of the rst universe will be shown to be precisely the sets of the Scott universe. The unisets of the second universe will be precisely the sets of the AFA-universe. We w i l l h a ve a closer look into the connection of the iterated circular multisets and arbitrary trees.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coalgebras for B N are directed graphs with N-weighted edges, often referred to as multigraphs [6]. 6.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coalgebras for B N are directed graphs with N-weighted edges, often referred to as multigraphs [6]. 6.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This captures the semantics of graded modalities over multigraphs [15], which are precisely the B-coalgebras. Unlike in the modal case [27], the multigraph semantics does not engender the same notion of satisfiability as the more standard Kripke semantics of graded modalities, as the latter validates all formulas ¬♦ 1 i, i ∈ N. One can however polynomially encode Kripke semantics into multigraph semantics: a graded hybrid formula φ, w.l.o.g.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coalgebra has emerged as the right level of generality for a unified treatment of a wide range of modalities with seemingly disparate semantics beyond the realm of pure relational structures. Examples include monotone modalities [Chellas 1980], probabilistic modalities [Larsen and Skou 1991], graded modalities [Fine 1972;D'Agostino and Visser 2002], coalitional/alternatingtime modalities [Alur et al 2002;Pauly 2002], and various non-monotonic conditionals [Friedman and Halpern 1994;Olivetti et al 2007]. The semantics of coalgebraic logic is parametrized over the choice of an endofunctor on the category of sets, whose coalgebras play the role of frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%