Final-year medical students’ competence profiles according to the modified requirement tracking questionnaire

Abstract

Background Undergraduate medical education is supposed to equip medical students with basic competences to select any specialty of their choice for postgraduate training. Medical specialties are characterized by a great diversity of their daily work routines and require different sets of competence facets. This study examines the self-assessed competence profiles of final-year undergraduate medical students and their specialty choice for postgraduate training. Students’ profiles, who wish to choose anaesthesiology, internal medicine, or paediatrics, are compared with the physicians’ competence profiles from these three disciplines. Methods In this study, 148 volunteer final-year undergraduate medical students completed the modified requirement-tracking (R-Track) questionnaire for self-assessment of their competence profiles. The R-Track questionnaire contains 63 competence facets assigned to six areas of competence: “Mental abilities”, “Sensory abilities”, “Psychomotor & multitasking abilities”, “Social interactive competences”, “Motivation”, and “Personality traits”. The expression of the different competence facets had to be assessed on a 5-point Likert scale (1: “very low” to 5: “very high”). Additionally, socio-demographic data and the participants’ first choice of a medical speciality for postgraduate education were collected. We used analysis of variance (ANOVA) for mean score comparison of subgroups and least significant difference (LSD) tests for post hoc analysis. Results The competence area with the highest rating was “Motivation” (3.70 ± 0.47) while “Psychomotor & multitasking abilities” received the lowest rating (3.34 ± 0.68). Individual facets of competence ranked from “In need of harmony” (4.36 ± 0.72), followed by “Tactfulness” (4.26 ± 0.64), and “Cooperation/Agreeableness” (4.24 ± 0.53) to “Risk orientation” (2.90 ± 0.92), “Mathematical reasoning” (2.87 ± 1.25), and “Sanctioning” (2.26 ± 0.93). The students’ competence profiles showed 100 % congruence with physicians’ competence profiles of the postgraduate specialty of their choice for internal medicine, 33.3 % for paediatrics, and 0 % for anaesthesiology. Conclusions Undergraduate medical students could define their competence profiles with the modified R-Track questionnaire and compare them with the profile of their desired specialty for postgraduate training to discover possible learning gaps or to detect good specialty matches. A combination of students’ competence self-assessment with an external assessment of students’ facets of competence could provide curricular planners with useful information how to design learning opportunities for specific facets of competence.

Assessment of clinical competence of graduating medical students in Ethiopia

“…31 Similar to our nding, a study identi ed that the psychomotor abilities of nal-year medical students were weak. 32,33 Our study also depicted that the medical students' motivation in clinical learning, practice exposure amount, and academic performance were associated with competency development. A piece of evidence also reiterated our claim that repeated practice opportunities to students boost the competencies learned and experiences acquired enough for real health jobs.…”

Advanced undergraduate medical students’ perceptions of basic medical competences and specific competences for different medical specialties – a qualitative study

“…In December 2020, sixty-four advanced medical students from year 4 and 5 of a 6-year undergraduate medical curriculum, 65.6% female and 34.4% male, participated in a competence-based training simulating the first day of residency under pandemic conditions [ 31 ]. This training included a telemedicine-based consulting hour with four simulated patients, documentation, and management with electronic patient charts, and one case presentation per participant in a virtual round with an attending physician.…”

Self-assessment of problem-solving skills and Clinical Reasoning among sixth-year medical students University of Baghdad / College of medicine

“…A good doctor must be a good critical thinker and a good problem solver Competence can be defined as the habitual and judicious use of communication, knowledge, technical skills, clinical reasoning, emotion, values, and reflection in daily practice for the benefit of the individual and the community being served. [8] In this research we want to assess the ability to solve problems in final year medical students since many of these skills have been confronted, tested and experienced throughout the medical school [9]. The Individual Generic Skills Test.…”

“…In this research we want to assess the ability to solve problems in final year medical students since many of these skills have been confronted, tested and experienced throughout the medical school [9]. The Individual Generic Skills Test.…”