2022
DOI: 10.1089/ast.2021.0121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Final Report of the Mars Sample Return Science Planning Group 2 (MSPG2)

Abstract: This paper was written by the MSR Science Planning Group 2 (MSPG2) working under a Terms of Reference from NASA and ESA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is probable that samples hosting putative biosignatures will be known long prior to their return to Earth, during which time an appropriate analytical protocol can be developed ( cf . Rummel and Kminek, 2018 ; Kminek et al, 2022 ; Meyer et al, 2022 ), likely on a sample-by-sample basis. A wide range of returned sample science could be proposed further to in situ analyses conducted by Perseverance in order to confirm or disprove their potential biogenic nature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is probable that samples hosting putative biosignatures will be known long prior to their return to Earth, during which time an appropriate analytical protocol can be developed ( cf . Rummel and Kminek, 2018 ; Kminek et al, 2022 ; Meyer et al, 2022 ), likely on a sample-by-sample basis. A wide range of returned sample science could be proposed further to in situ analyses conducted by Perseverance in order to confirm or disprove their potential biogenic nature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies also provide initial guidance for sample return. At present, preparations for MSR are being formulated and refined with emphasis on analytical strategies, curation and sample storage, and planetary protection (Rummel and Kminek, 2018 ; Smith et al, 2021 ; Kminek et al, 2022 ; Meyer et al, 2022 ; Tait et al, 2022 ). Defining the datasets to which we will have access from only in situ rover analyses will facilitate the prioritization of analyses conducted on returned materials and could conceivably incentivize the development of instrumentation or analytical approaches enabling missing data to be acquired.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remote sensing and in situ science conducted by the Mars 2020 Perseverance rover show that the rocks exposed at the floor of Jezero Crater are in fact igneous, but have distinct formation histories (Bell et al, 2022;Farley et al, 2022;Liu et al, 2022;Scheller et al, 2022;Tice et al, 2022;Wiens et al, 2022). Hypotheses related to the origin of Mars and the evolution of its interior and surface motivated by both meteorite and Mars mission work will be further tested by Earth-based analyses of rock samples collected by Perseverance following MSR (Kminek et al, 2022;Meyer et al, 2022). As presented below and detailed in supporting studies contained in this special volume, the analyses conducted by Perseverance, particularly on abrasion sites, show that the bedrock units in Jezero are igneous in origin.…”
Section: Exploration Of Crater Floor Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mars 2020 mission is the first step in a multi‐stage international effort towards Mars Sample Return (MSR), which has been a high priority of the international planetary science community for decades (e.g., Kminek et al., 2022; Meyer et al., 2022). While several different approaches to MSR have been considered in the past, the National Research Council (2011) Vision and Voyages for Planetary Science in the Decade 2013–2022 recommended the collection of well‐documented samples from a selected site on Mars by a rover capable of mineralogic and geochemical characterization.…”
Section: Mars Sample Return From Jezero Cratermentioning
confidence: 99%