2015
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2014.118588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Final report of a phase II study of imatinib mesylate with hyper-CVAD for the front-line treatment of adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
131
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
131
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…CMR rates vary on the basis of which TKI is added to chemotherapy, ranging from 28% to 50% with imatinib, 7,15,16 45% to 65% with dasatinib, 9,12 and 78% with ponatinib, 13 and the survival rates achieved seem to be better with each successive generation of TKI, although no randomized trials have yet been performed to confirm this observation. In our cohort, the CMR rate at 3 months in patients who received ponatinib was more than twofold that of patients who received imatinib.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMR rates vary on the basis of which TKI is added to chemotherapy, ranging from 28% to 50% with imatinib, 7,15,16 45% to 65% with dasatinib, 9,12 and 78% with ponatinib, 13 and the survival rates achieved seem to be better with each successive generation of TKI, although no randomized trials have yet been performed to confirm this observation. In our cohort, the CMR rate at 3 months in patients who received ponatinib was more than twofold that of patients who received imatinib.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of these regimens have been published previously. 1,[25][26][27][28][29] The choice of the 2 regimens was based on a variety of factors: time period (hyper-CVAD, year 2000 onwards; augmented BFM, years 2006-2012); age (18 years and older for hyper-CVAD-based regimens; 40 years and younger for augmented BFM); clinical trial eligibility; insurance coverage of clinical trials; and patient or physician preference. In the Ph 1 cohort, all but 3 patients received TKIs (imatinib, n 5 12; dasatinib, n 5 24; ponatinib, n 5 7).…”
Section: Study Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of CHR, these results compare favorably with those reported by other studies in which imatinib was administered concomitantly to chemotherapy or in various schedules during induction or consolidation, with CHR rates ranging from 72% to 96%. 5,6,10,12,13,15,[18][19][20][21]34,35 Furthermore, our schedule has the advantage that there are fewer deaths during induction treatment, in contrast to the majority of the combination studies in which, with few exceptions, 5 toxic deaths were recorded in 2%-7% of cases. 6,8,[12][13][14][18][19][20] Indeed, toxicity was recorded in the initial combination protocol (imatinib+chemotherapy) that led to the final amendment to a sequential strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Thus, our long-term outcome results appear superior; this could be due to the fact that we have had no deaths in induction nor major toxicities associated to chemotherapy, which was delivered to patients (96% of cases) already in hematologic remission. All relapses occurred after completing the imatinib plus steroids induction phase and took place during/after the post-consolidation therapy; in fact, the median time to relapse from achievement of the first CHR was 7.6 months.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation