2019
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz394.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Final efficacy results from B-F1RST, a prospective phase II trial evaluating blood-based tumour mutational burden (bTMB) as a predictive biomarker for atezolizumab (atezo) in 1L non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…HR for PFS and OS improved between high and low bTMB groups with increasing bTMB thresholds, from HR 1.16 and 0.95 at a threshold of bTMB greater than or equal to 10 to HR 0.59 and 0.44, respectively, at a threshold of bTMB greater than or equal to 20. 41 Other prospective studies of bTMB as a predictive biomarker for ICI (including the basket Blood First Assay Screening Trial [BFAST] trial) are ongoing. 42…”
Section: Clinical Trial Data Suggesting Use Of Blood Tmb As a Biomarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HR for PFS and OS improved between high and low bTMB groups with increasing bTMB thresholds, from HR 1.16 and 0.95 at a threshold of bTMB greater than or equal to 10 to HR 0.59 and 0.44, respectively, at a threshold of bTMB greater than or equal to 20. 41 Other prospective studies of bTMB as a predictive biomarker for ICI (including the basket Blood First Assay Screening Trial [BFAST] trial) are ongoing. 42…”
Section: Clinical Trial Data Suggesting Use Of Blood Tmb As a Biomarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, patients at this prespecified bTMB cutoff only had numerical benefit for PFS and OS. 12 Two possible reasons might explain this result. First, tumor mutational burden is dynamic and could be changed after treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…11 However, a prospective, phase II, B-F1RST study only showed a trend toward a PFS benefit (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.66; 90% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-1.02; P = .12) and an OS benefit (HR = 0.77; 90% CI: 0.41-1.43; P = .48). 12 Cancer is a genetic disease, and multiple genetic mutations may lead to resistance to therapy, including immunotherapy. 13 Recent studies revealed that bTMB reflected overall tumor burden.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the optimal gene panel and bTMB threshold should be better adjusted for each situation. A first-line B-F1RST trial [21] tried to predict survival with atezolizumab by using bTMB cut-point 16, which was identified in the prior study based on subsequent-line patients [1], and they failed to obtain significant results for OS or PFS. Dynamic change of ctDNA load and bTMB from treatment-naïve patients to previously-treated patients might account for this inconsistency.…”
Section: How Could Btmb Threshold and Gene Panel Design For Particulamentioning
confidence: 99%