2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Final Comment: Return‐to‐Play Decision Making: Does Level of Competition Make a Difference?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For football, shorter SRT and RTP combined with a higher number of symptoms among Varsity athletes compared with other levels of play could indicate that as the level of competition increases, there may be increased pressure for athletes to be medically cleared to play sooner. This is consistent with studies that show that RTP may be impacted by the perceived urgency and/or pressure of the athletes, coaches, teammates, and parents for the athlete to RTP 46–48. Alternatively, because ATs are more readily available in Varsity sports,36 this potentially results in more comprehensive and consistent injury management leading to shorter SRT and quicker clearance to RTP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For football, shorter SRT and RTP combined with a higher number of symptoms among Varsity athletes compared with other levels of play could indicate that as the level of competition increases, there may be increased pressure for athletes to be medically cleared to play sooner. This is consistent with studies that show that RTP may be impacted by the perceived urgency and/or pressure of the athletes, coaches, teammates, and parents for the athlete to RTP 46–48. Alternatively, because ATs are more readily available in Varsity sports,36 this potentially results in more comprehensive and consistent injury management leading to shorter SRT and quicker clearance to RTP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This is consistent with studies that show that RTP may be impacted by the perceived urgency and/or pressure of the athletes, coaches, teammates, and parents for the athlete to RTP. [46][47][48] Alternatively, because ATs are more readily available in Varsity sports, 36 this potentially results in more comprehensive and consistent injury management leading to shorter SRT and quicker clearance to RTP. In addition, parents of varsity football athletes may be more motivated to seek RTP clearance and medical appointments more quickly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of RTP decisions for young athletes, some argue that it is ultimately the duty of a sports medicine physician to make the appropriate assessment of recovery time, assess the level of acceptable risk, and provide the final return to play clearance (Liem, Olafsen, Harrast, & Herring, 2016). For instance, in Serrell v. Connetquot Central High School District of Islip, the Court "ultimately placed the responsibility for determinations concerning injuries and the return to play after an injury on the medical personnel examining and/or treating the injured student" when the school and district had promulgated rules concerning head injuries (Serrell, 2001).…”
Section: B Physiciansmentioning
confidence: 99%