2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ic.2005.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Final coalgebras for functors on measurable spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The notion of measurable polynomial functor was introduced and developed in [MV04,Vig05,MV06], where it is shown that the category of T -coalgebras and T -morphisms for a measurable polynomial T has a terminal object, known as a final T -coalgebra. 1…”
Section: Measurable Functors and Coalgebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The notion of measurable polynomial functor was introduced and developed in [MV04,Vig05,MV06], where it is shown that the category of T -coalgebras and T -morphisms for a measurable polynomial T has a terminal object, known as a final T -coalgebra. 1…”
Section: Measurable Functors and Coalgebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set Ing T of ingredients can be defined inductively by putting Vig05,MV06] do not discuss exponential functors, but the theory readily includes them. X E is essentially a special case of the direct product Q e∈E Xe with Xe = X.…”
Section: The Multigraph Of Ingredientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moss and Viglizzo [23,30] showed that polynomial functors extended with the Giry functor have a final coalgebra. Therefore, for L a finite set of action labels, we are allowed to safely adopt behavioural equivalence over ∆ L -coalgebras, since ∆ L ∼ = α∈L ∆ is a finite product, hence admits a final coalgebra.…”
Section: Continuous Probabilistic Systems As Coalgebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in order to port this approach to our setting we have to solve several technical issues, due to the fact that we are working in Meas and using the Giry functor ∆. First, ∆ does not preserve weak pullbacks [23,30], hence we cannot prove that bisimilarity is transitive and that it coincides with behavioural equivalence. As a consequence, we focus on behavioural equivalence instead of bisimilarity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%