2016
DOI: 10.1515/jgth-2016-0508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filtrations of free groups arising from the lower central series

Abstract: We make a systematic study of filtrations of a free group F defined as products of powers of the lower central series of F . Under some assumptions on the exponents, we characterize these filtrations in terms of the group algebra, the Magnus algebra of non-commutative power series, and linear representations by upper-triangular unipotent matrices. These characterizations generalize classical results of Grün, Magnus, Witt, and Zassenhaus from the 1930s, as well as later results on the lower p-central filtration… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following result gives similar restrictions on the Magnus coefficients of elements of S (n,p) . In the discrete case it was proved in [2,Example 4.6], where it was further shown that these restrictions in fact characterize S (n,p) . While it is possible to derive the proposition from the discrete case using a density argument, we provide a direct proof.…”
Section: The Fundamental Matrixmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following result gives similar restrictions on the Magnus coefficients of elements of S (n,p) . In the discrete case it was proved in [2,Example 4.6], where it was further shown that these restrictions in fact characterize S (n,p) . While it is possible to derive the proposition from the discrete case using a density argument, we provide a direct proof.…”
Section: The Fundamental Matrixmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Lyndon words of length ≤ 2 are the words w = (x) and w = (xy), with x,y ∈ X, x < y. Then σ w is τ p j 2 (1) w = x p and τ p j 2 (2) w = [x,y], respectively. In [8, §10] it is shown that the value of w,w , where w,w are Lyndon words of lengths ≤ 2, is 1 if w = w and is 0 otherwise.…”
Section: Proposition 53 Let H Be the Hall Set Of All Lyndon Words In X * The Fundamental Matrix Of H Of Level N Is Unitriangular (Ie Unimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IV.1.9]. We also refer to [CE16] for a nice discussion of filtrations defined by induction. This description has a nice consequence, similar to Proposition 1.9 (we abbreviate L(Γ…”
Section: The Stable P-restricted Andreadakis Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, for a more general profinite group G (such as G F ), one takes a profinite presentation, i.e., a continuous epimorphism π : S → G, where S is a free profinite group, and transfers the equality (1.1) from S to G. The first part is purely group-theoretic, and is usually proved using Magnus theory, i.e., by viewing the elements of G = S as formal power series. A general machinery to obtain such results in the free profinite case is given in [Efr14b] (see also [CE16]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%