2000
DOI: 10.1080/1554477x.2000.9970920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filtering the female: Television news coverage of the 1993 Canadian leaders' debates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the women who were newly elected to the US Congress in 1992, the so-called "year of the woman," received more mentions by name in major newspapers than did newly elected men~Carroll and Schreiber, 1997: 135!. Women leaders of Canadian national parties who engaged in confrontational behaviour during televised party leaders' debates attracted more coverage than equally combative male politicians because of the newsworthiness of their unexpectedly aggressive behaviour~Everitt and Gidengil, 2003;Gidengil and Everitt, 2000!.…”
Section: Women Politicians and Media Visibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the women who were newly elected to the US Congress in 1992, the so-called "year of the woman," received more mentions by name in major newspapers than did newly elected men~Carroll and Schreiber, 1997: 135!. Women leaders of Canadian national parties who engaged in confrontational behaviour during televised party leaders' debates attracted more coverage than equally combative male politicians because of the newsworthiness of their unexpectedly aggressive behaviour~Everitt and Gidengil, 2003;Gidengil and Everitt, 2000!.…”
Section: Women Politicians and Media Visibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the lack of comparative research (with the notable exception of Kittilson and Fridkin 2008) has meant that it is has been difficult to investigate how electoral systems and candidate selection contribute to the coverage of female candidates. These questions are even more relevant, as some scholars have failed to find a gender bias in candidate coverage (see, for example, Hayes and Lawless 2013; Heldman, Oliver, and Conroy 2009; Smith 1997; Uscinski and Goren 2011) while others do find gendered patterns in media coverage (for example, Gidengil and Everitt 2000; Heldman, Carroll, and Olson 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study may not have addressed the only gender‐related campaign effects. Further studies could analyse the media coverage of party leaders and explore whether the amount and type of media coverage about party leaders during the campaign affect the voter sympathy toward party leaders and assessment of leader characteristics (see Gidengil & Everitt , , , ; van Zoonen , ). Such studies could further contribute to what voter considerations in regard to gender stereotyping and gender identity are present during campaigns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%