1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8890(99)00014-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filtering in a unit quaternion space for model-based object tracking

Abstract: The main idea in object tracking is to support the processing of incoming images by predicting future object's poses and features using the knowledge about the object's previous motion. In this paper we present a new method for the prediction and adjustment of motion parameters to the current measurements using the quaternion representation for the orientation and the Gauss-Newton iteration on the unit sphere S 3 . Unlike other trackers, our tracker searches for estimates directly in the space of rigid body mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although being a transformation by itself, it subsumes rotation and translation. To distinguish between two rigid body motions, a distance measure on the manifold has to be defined [7,42]. But this is no simple task in general.…”
Section: The Stratification Hierarchy and Pose Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although being a transformation by itself, it subsumes rotation and translation. To distinguish between two rigid body motions, a distance measure on the manifold has to be defined [7,42]. But this is no simple task in general.…”
Section: The Stratification Hierarchy and Pose Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second advantage of the approach is that the error measures are formalized in the 3D Euclidean space and are directly connected to a spatial distance measure. This is in contrast to other approaches, where the minimization of estimating errors of the rigid body motion has to be computed directly on the manifold of the geometric transformation [7,42]. The third argument is that the depth dependence of the 3D constraints can be adapted in each situation.…”
Section: Principles Of Solving the Pose Estimation Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such compact equations subsume the pose estimation problem at hand: find the best motor M which satisfies the constraint. But in contrast to other approaches, where the minimization of errors has to be computed directly on the manifold of the geometric transformations (Chiuso and Picci, 1998;Ude, 1999), in our approach a distance in the Euclidean space constitutes the error measure. To change our constraint equation from the conformal to the Euclidean space, the equations are rescaled without loosing linearity within our unknowns.…”
Section: Pose Estimation In Stratified Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such compact equations subsume the pose estimation problem at hand: find the best motor M which satisfies the constraint. However, in contrast to other approaches, where the minimization of errors has to be computed directly on the manifold of the geometric transformations [8], [47], in our approach a distance in the Euclidean space constitutes the error measure. To change our constraint equation from the conformal to the Euclidean space, the equations are rescaled without loosing linearity within our unknowns.…”
Section: Pose Estimation In Stratified Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%