2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Film thickness, interfacial waviness and heat transfer during downflow condensation of R134a

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For conventional horizontal channels (D h > 3 mm), condensation models differentiate between gravity-dominated flow regime, where the heat transfer coefficient is sensitive to the saturation-to-wall temperature difference driving force, and shear-dominated flow regime, owing to the influence of mass flux and vapor quality [42][43][44][45][46][47] . For mini-/micro-channels, since the gravity effect condensation is expected to be less important, correlations developed for condensation inside circular conventional tubes may not be able to accurately predict the heat transfer coefficient, especially at small mass flux [48][49][50][51] .…”
Section: Numerical and Analytical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For conventional horizontal channels (D h > 3 mm), condensation models differentiate between gravity-dominated flow regime, where the heat transfer coefficient is sensitive to the saturation-to-wall temperature difference driving force, and shear-dominated flow regime, owing to the influence of mass flux and vapor quality [42][43][44][45][46][47] . For mini-/micro-channels, since the gravity effect condensation is expected to be less important, correlations developed for condensation inside circular conventional tubes may not be able to accurately predict the heat transfer coefficient, especially at small mass flux [48][49][50][51] .…”
Section: Numerical and Analytical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When investigating the condensation heat transfer in the micro-scale, there is an intrinsic difficulty in measuring accurately such small thicknesses of the condensate (below 100 µm). Among the few studies available in the literature, Berto et al [5][6][7] performed liquid film thickness measurements of R245fa, R134a and HFE-7000 during condensation inside a 3.38 mm channel using shadowgraphy and chromatic confocal imaging. Han et al [8] employed a laser confocal displacement meter for measuring the liquid film thickness during IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2766/1/012131 2 annular flow of degassed water and air inside tubes with 0.3, 0.5 and 1.0 mm inner diameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%