2000
DOI: 10.1080/10286630009358137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Film policy and cooperation between east and west: The case of France and Romania in the nineties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the best-laid plans of bureaucrats and operatives in both countries, this continuing shift of money, talent and technological know-how is by no means an automatic and orderly process. However, after discussing the implications of the agreement with many Korean and Chinese film industry representatives during multiple visits to China and Korea, the author believes that the two countries are on the cusp of something that differs radically from the experience of other national cinemas and some of the particular cultural diversity and theoretical framework settings that have received considerable attention in the past (see, for example, Moran 1996 andJäckel 2000). More specifically, as the present article demonstrates, the China-Korea connection remains more robust and enmeshed than China's links with any of the other countries with which it has a co-production treaty; in late 2015 these included: Australia 2007 2010, and Spain (2014).…”
Section: The Forging Of Chinese-korean Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the best-laid plans of bureaucrats and operatives in both countries, this continuing shift of money, talent and technological know-how is by no means an automatic and orderly process. However, after discussing the implications of the agreement with many Korean and Chinese film industry representatives during multiple visits to China and Korea, the author believes that the two countries are on the cusp of something that differs radically from the experience of other national cinemas and some of the particular cultural diversity and theoretical framework settings that have received considerable attention in the past (see, for example, Moran 1996 andJäckel 2000). More specifically, as the present article demonstrates, the China-Korea connection remains more robust and enmeshed than China's links with any of the other countries with which it has a co-production treaty; in late 2015 these included: Australia 2007 2010, and Spain (2014).…”
Section: The Forging Of Chinese-korean Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Despite the best-laid plans of bureaucrats and operatives in both countries, this continuing shift of money, talent and technological know-how is by no means an automatic and orderly process. However, after discussing the implications of the agreement with many Korean and Chinese film industry representatives during multiple visits to China and Korea, the author believes that the two countries are on 20 the cusp of something that differs radically from the experience of other national cinemas and some of the particular cultural diversity and theoretical framework settings that have received considerable attention in the past (see, for example, Moran 1996 andJäckel 2000). More specifically, as the present article demonstrates, the China-Korea connection remains more robust and enmeshed than China's links 25 with any of the other countries with which it has a co-production treaty; in late 2015 these included: Australia ( (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%