Filling in Gaps in the Ceratopsid Histologic Database: Histology of Two Basal Centrosaurines and an Assessment of the Utility of Rib Histology in the Ceratopsidae

Hedrick, Brandon P; Goldsmith, E; Rivera-Sylva, Héctor E.; Fiorillo, Anthony R.; Tumarkin‐Deratzian, Allison R.; Dodson, Peter

doi:10.1002/ar.24099

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the pterosaur Pteranodon no ‘immature’ bone grain was found in individuals that possessed postcranial co‐ossifications or fully ossified epiphyses (Bennett, 1993). This is despite evidence that periodic interruption of growth occurred during ontogeny in both centrosaurines (Levitt, 2013; Hedrick et al ., 2020) and in Pteranodon and other pterodactyloid pterosaurs (Sayão, 2003; Chinsamy, Codorniú & Chiappe, 2008; Chinsamy et al ., 2009; Bennett, 2018). There is, therefore, much work to be done to determine how long bone surface textures relate to histology and other metrics of maturity in different clades of extinct taxa, many of which grow unlike any reptiles alive today.…”

Section: Methods Of Assessing Maturitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing ontogenetic maturity in extinct saurian reptiles

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Morphology forms the most fundamental level of data in vertebrate palaeontology because it is through interpretations of morphology that taxa are identified, creating the basis for broad evolutionary and palaeobiological hypotheses. Assessing maturity is one of the most basic aspects of morphological interpretation and provides the means to study the evolution of ontogenetic changes, population structure and palaeoecology, life‐history strategies, and heterochrony along evolutionary lineages that would otherwise be lost to time. Saurian reptiles (the least‐inclusive clade containing Lepidosauria and Archosauria) have remained an incredibly diverse, numerous, and disparate clade through their ~260‐million‐year history. Because of the great disparity in this group, assessing maturity of saurian reptiles is difficult, fraught with methodological and terminological ambiguity. We compiled a novel database of literature, assembling >900 individual instances of saurian maturity assessment, to examine critically how saurian maturity has been diagnosed. We review the often inexact and inconsistent terminology used in saurian maturity assessment (e.g. ‘juvenile’, ‘mature’) and provide routes for better clarity and cross‐study coherence. We describe the various methods that have been used to assess maturity in every major saurian group, integrating data from both extant and extinct taxa to give a full account of the current state of the field and providing method‐specific pitfalls, best practices, and fruitful directions for future research. We recommend that a new standard subsection, ‘Ontogenetic Assessment’, be added to the Systematic Palaeontology portions of descriptive studies to provide explicit ontogenetic diagnoses with clear criteria. Because the utility of different ontogenetic criteria is highly subclade dependent among saurians, even for widely used methods (e.g. neurocentral suture fusion), we recommend that phylogenetic context, preferably in the form of a phylogenetic bracket, be used to justify the use of a maturity assessment method. Different methods should be used in conjunction as independent lines of evidence when assessing maturity, instead of an ontogenetic diagnosis resting entirely on a single criterion, which is common in the literature. Critically, there is a need for data from extant taxa with well‐represented growth series to be integrated with the fossil record to ground maturity assessments of extinct taxa in well‐constrained, empirically tested methods.

show abstract

Section: Methods Of Assessing Maturitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing ontogenetic maturity in extinct saurian reptiles

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This shows that the mammalian (endothermic) histological growth is not dependent on climatic conditions but rather by endogenous constraints. Hedrick et al (2020) suggested an initial climate-induced gradient in growth patterns for ceratopsian dinosaurs, but additional sampling of closely-related taxa from geographically similar localities showed marked differences in histology, thus these patterns were most likely phylogenetically induced.…”

Section: Growth Marks and Environmental Influencementioning

confidence: 99%

Growth and limb bone histology of aetosaurs and phytosaurs from the Late Triassic Krasiejów locality (sw Poland) reveals strong environmental influence on growth pattern

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The growth pattern of the Polish phytosaur Parasuchus cf. arenaceus and the aetosaur Stagonolepis olenkae (both Krasiejów; Norian) was studied. Results were compared to published data of other members of these two groups and to a new sample of the German (Heslach; Norian) phytosaur Nicrosaurus sp. All three herein studied taxa display lamellar-zonal bone consisting predominately of parallel-fibred tissue and on average a low to moderate vascular density. Towards the outer cortex the thickness of annuli increases in most samples and becomes distinctly wider than the zones. Therefore, most of the appositional growth in adults was achieved during phases of prolonged slow growth. All bones show a diffuse growth pattern, without well demarcated zones and annuli. Distinct lines of arrested growth (lag) are not identified in the Krasiejów sample, only the Nicrosaurus femur shows one distinct lag as do other taxa outside Krasiejów. Instead, the Krasiejów taxa display multiple rest lines and sub-cycles. Thus, identification and count of annual growth cycles remains difficult, the finally counted annual growth cycles range (two to six) is quite large despite the low size range of the samples. A correlation between age and bone length is not identified, indicating developmental plasticity. Although both are archosaurs, Stagonolepis and Parasuchus are phylogenetically not closely related, however, they show a very similar growth pattern, despite different life styles (terrestrial vs. semi-aquatic). Based on the new data, and previously histological studies from Krasiejów, the local environmental conditions were special and had a strong influence on the growth pattern.

show abstract

“…His contributions to understanding the world of dinosaurs—from his paleontological findings, scholarly writings, museum exhibit creations, and birthing of superb progeny—have made him stand out in the world of dinosaur science. Indeed, Peter has given much to our own journal, being a frequent contributor (e.g., Dodson, 2003, 2009, 2020; Hedrick et al, 2020, 2022; Schachner et al, 2009, 2011; Tumanova et al, 2023), and Guest Editing two of the most popular Special Issues in our history, “Unearthing the Anatomy of Dinosaurs: New Insights into their Functional Morphology and Paleobiology” (Dodson, 2009; Laitman, 2009; Laitman & Albertine, 2009) and “The Hidden World of Dinosaurs” (Hedrick & Dodson, 2020; Laitman & Albertine, 2020; Figure 2). The 2009 Special Issue, our first on dinosaurs, was so much in demand that our Publisher, Wiley, had to print additional copies for individual sale (Dodson Dinos make money, at least for Wiley!…”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

Dinosaurs of all ilks bow and pay tribute to Peter Dodson, their intrepid chronicler, in an Anatomical Record Special Issue in his honor

Laitman

Smith

2023

The Anatomical Record

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Amazing how even after half of a century some things do not change. Together again at the University of Pennsylvania, Peter Dodson and editorial co-author JL are energetically talking about six things at once, catching up as old friends are wont to do. Walking along the beautiful, tree-lined, quiet of Locust walk, topics bounce from new dinosaur finds, to what the children (and grandchildren!) are up to, to which of our body parts are the latest to stop working well (hey, we have known each other for some 50 years!). As has been the case since our days together at Yale, JL is lagging behind as Peter's energy, now as back in New Haven, has him moving ever faster than his old anatomy table mate. "C'mon, Jeff," the august Penn Prof admonishes, "we finally get an audience with Professor Leidy, and let's not be late!" Yes, indeed. We have finally arranged a formal audience to see Professor Joseph Leidy, or, more specifically, his brain. For those of you who are not acquainted with Professor Leidy (shame, shame!), he was America's first dinosaur paleontologist of note, having reported and named (in 1858 and1865;Leidy, 1858Leidy, , 1865 the first American dinosaur, the "duck-billed" Hadrosaurus, unearthed in New Jersey (and you thought the state's only remains of note were those of Mob boss Jimmy Hoffa!). Subsequently, Leidy reconstructed Hadrosaurus at the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences in 1868, the first museum display of any dinosaur. He estimated it to be 25 ft long and, based on its small forelimbs and long hind limbs, gave it a "kangaroo-like" stance with a semi-upright posture. Indeed, this vertical position became the image of dinosaurs imprinted in our collective visualization that remains to this day (see Dodson, 2009 for discussion). Leidy's day job was as the Professor of Anatomy at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (the first in the United States), and he was a polymath of such renown that his biographer boldly titled his story, Joseph Leidy: The Last Man Who Knew Everything (Warren, 1999). Indeed, when the parent organization of The Anatomical Record, the American Association for Anatomy was formed in 1888 (originally named the Association of American Anatomists, today seen as an exclusionary banner, but done then to

show abstract

Filling in Gaps in the Ceratopsid Histologic Database: Histology of Two Basal Centrosaurines and an Assessment of the Utility of Rib Histology in the Ceratopsidae

Cited by 8 publications

References 36 publications

Assessing ontogenetic maturity in extinct saurian reptiles

Assessing ontogenetic maturity in extinct saurian reptiles

Growth and limb bone histology of aetosaurs and phytosaurs from the Late Triassic Krasiejów locality (sw Poland) reveals strong environmental influence on growth pattern

Dinosaurs of all ilks bow and pay tribute to Peter Dodson, their intrepid chronicler, in an Anatomical Record Special Issue in his honor

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About